You may also like...
-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.01.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.1167 of 2022 M.Gagan Bothra … Petitioner. judgment regarding marking xerox copy of cheque in 138 N.I act case Therefore, the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.10603 of 2019 is hereby set aside and the trial Court is directed to receive the xerox copy of the disputed cheque and other related documents mentioned in Crl.M.P.No.10603 of 2019 as the secondary evidence and permit the accused/respondent to let in evidence to prove that the original cheque has been returned by the father of the petitioner on 18.07.2017 and dispose the case, within a period of four months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. With the above direction, this Criminal Revision Petition is Allowed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2023
-
Transgender case lordship m s ramesh full order
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 2, 2022
-
[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC ( cri ) 181 : Abdul wahab k vs state of kerala : Public prosecutor under section 321 CRPC 1973 can withdraw from prosecution at any time before the judgement is pronounced , but he has to apply his / her own mind and consider the effect of withdrawal on the society in the event such permission is granted[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aman Lohia vs kiran Lohia transferred case ( civil ) no 25 of 2021 dated 17- 03- 2021 : family court required to follow procedure under CPC and provide parties with sufficient time and opportunity to present their claim in form of pleadings and evidence before determination of dispute[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aparna bhatt & others vs state of madhya pradesh criminal appeal no 329 of 2021 dated 18- 03- 2021 : bail conditions should not mandate require or permit contact between accused and victim , such conditions should seek to protect complainant from any further harassment by accused[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : chief information commissioner vs high court of gujarat civil appeal no 1966 – 1967 of 2020 dated 4- 03- 2020 : suo moto disclosure of information on important aspects of working of a public authority is an essential component of information regime[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : state bank of india vs Ajay kumar sood : SLP no 4038 of 2021 dated 12- 03- 2021 : court judgements should be in language which can be understood not only by lawyers but also to citizens who approached courts[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 7, 2024