Follow:
- Next story No Jurisdiction of AO in Reopening of Assessment after 4 years by Reason of Failure on part of assessee: Madras HC Justice M. Sathyanarayanan and Justice Abdul Quddhose uphold the decision of the lower authority in the light of various presidents and held that there is no jurisdiction of Assessing officer (AO) in reopening of Assessment after 4 years by reason of failure on part of the assessee.
- Previous story New Delhi: The central government has sent back over a dozen names cleared by the Supreme Court collegium for elevation as high court judges, urging “reconsideration”, ThePrint has learnt.
Recent Posts
- today tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE MEDICAL EXPENSES WILL BE REIMBURSED WHEN THE PENSIONER TAKEN A TREATMENT IN NON-NETWORKING HOSPITAL?
- கோர்ட்டுக்கு வந்த சவுக்கு சங்கர் – பார்த்தவுடன் நீதிபதிகள் போட்ட உத்தரவு
- (no title)
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
More
Recent Posts
- today tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE MEDICAL EXPENSES WILL BE REIMBURSED WHEN THE PENSIONER TAKEN A TREATMENT IN NON-NETWORKING HOSPITAL?
- கோர்ட்டுக்கு வந்த சவுக்கு சங்கர் – பார்த்தவுடன் நீதிபதிகள் போட்ட உத்தரவு
- (no title)
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).