Judge writes to President, challenges CJI inquiry – The Economic Times – by Sekar Reporter · December 20, 2019 [12/20, 09:44] Sekarreporter 1: ram nath kovind: Judge writes to President, challenges CJI inquiry – The Economic Times – https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/judge-writes-to-president-challenges-cji-inquiry/articleshow/64312751.cms?utm_source=whatsapp_pwa&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialsharebuttons [12/20, 09:44] Sekarreporter 1: Increase Font Decrease Font Save News Cancel SHARE THIS NEWS Cancel Judge writes to President, challenges CJI inquiry ET Bureau | May 25, 2018, 08.15 AM IST Judge writes to President, challenges CJI inquiryBCCL Impeachment proceedings can only be initiated in Parliament by way of a petition signed either by 50 Rajya Sabha MPs or 100 Lok Sabha MPs. NEW DELHI: Allahabad high court judge S Narayan Shukla, who was recommended for impeachment by chief justice of India, has sent in a representation to President Ram Nath Kovind challenging the inquiry against him. Those familiar with the details of the development told ET that the President, in turn, has referred the same to the government, which is now actively considering to push it back to the CJI. The President, who has no constitutional role in initiating the process of impeachment of a judge, was put in a spot by the CJI when he sent a recommendation to Rashtrapati Bhavan to impeach justice Shukla. REGULATION Resolving uncertainties over FPI regulations By Vikas Dandekar and Teena Thacker READ 2 MORE STORIES Impeachment proceedings can only be initiated in Parliament by way of a petition signed either by 50 Rajya Sabha MPs or 100 Lok Sabha MPs. Justice Shukla has given the matter a fresh twist with his representation that he sent in April first week, two months after the CJI sent his recommendation to the President. ET has learnt that in his representation, justice Shukla has claimed that all the three judges were not present when he deposed before the inquiry on January 15. He has alleged that the rules require all of them to be there. The inquiry was conducted by three judges — Madras HC chief justice Indira Banerjee, Sikkim HC chief justice SK Agnihotri and the MP high court’s justice PK Jaiswal. The inquiry had found justice Shukla guilty of “judicial misconduct”. While the exact details were not known, the inquiry had focused on a bunch of complaints, including his role as executive council member in the Shankuntala Mishra National Rehabilitation University. Despite being indicted, justice Shukla did not resign. The CJI then in an unusual move recommended his impeachment to the President and in a separate letter to the prime minister sought his expulsion. Simultaneously, justice Shukla was relieved of all judicial work. Since impeachment is a legislative action, Rashtrapati Bhavan saw no role for the President in the matter. The government, which is already negotiating a tricky terrain with the judiciary, is now studying the representation and the rulebook to decide on the future course of action. In all likelihood, the matter may go back to the CJI, though a final call is yet to be taken. PEOPLE’S OPINION READ COMMENTS POST COMMENT SHARE THIS ARTICLE READ MORE ON RAM NATH KOVINDCJIDIPAK MISRAINDIRA BANERJEERASHTRAPATI BHAVANS NARAYAN SHUKLA Related News Justice Ranjan Gogoi retires as CJI Justice Ranjan Gogoi retires as CJI Justice Bobde to take oath as CJI on Monday Justice Bobde to take oath as CJI on Monday CJI: Bitter truths must remain in memory CJI: Bitter truths must remain in memory Former CJI TS Thakur to monitor probe against CG Power Former CJI TS Thakur to monitor probe against CG Power AMU students send memorandum to CJI Bobde to declare CAB unconstitutional AMU students send memorandum to CJI Bobde to declare CAB unconstitutional Most Read News What happens next in Tata-Mistry saga? Here are five scenarios What happens next in Tata-Mistry saga? Here are five scenarios All-India protests against Citizenship Act All-India protests against Citizenship Act RoC may soon classify Tata Sons as ‘public company’ RoC may soon classify Tata Sons as ‘public company’ RBI brings in India’s version of ‘Operation Twist’ to lower yields RBI brings in India’s version of ‘Operation Twist’ to lower yields Donald Trump impeached on two counts by House, setting up Senate trial Donald Trump impeached on two counts by House, setting up Senate trial Recommended News Govt begins industry consultations Govt begins industry consultations MPC members waited to see full impact of rate cuts MPC members waited to see full impact of rate cuts Court behind Tata order has often had rulings changed Court behind Tata order has often had rulings changed More From Our Partners 5 Mistakes to avoid while applying for a gold loan 5 Mistakes to avoid while applying for a gold loan What Makes Piped Cooking Gas So User-Friendly? What Makes Piped Cooking Gas So User-Friendly? Business NewsNewsPolitics and Nation Hot on Web Sensex TodayGold PriceMutual Fund ScreenerRakesh JhunjhunwalaRBI PolicyStock market crashGSTRupeeAadhaar CardRBIHow to save Income TaxCurrency ConverterIncome Tax Calculator In Case you missed it CAA Protests Live UpdatesCitizenship Amendment ActCAA BillCAA ProtestsYes BankCAACyrus MistryFasTAG DeadlineN ChandrasekaranDelhi GovtBudget 2020IPL Auction 2020Car InsuranceCAB ProtestsEPF contribution Trending Now CAA News LiveCyrus Mistry Tata SonsLatest NewsNRCDonald Trump ImpeachmentNRC and CAACAAPriyanka ChopraOyoMutual Fund ScreenerFD RatesBill Gates More from our network इकनॉमिक टाइम्सઈકોનોમિક ટાઈમ્સPune MirrorBangalore MirrorAhmedabad MirrorItsMyAscentEducation TimesBrand CapitalMumbai MirrorTimes NowIndiatimesमहाराष्ट्र टाइम्सವಿಜಯ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕGo GreenAdAge IndiaEisamayIGN India SamayTimes of IndiaSamayam TamilSamayam TeluguMiss KyraBombay TimesFilmipopGames AppMX Player DOWNLOAD ET APP FOLLOW US ON BECOME A MEMBER Terms of Use & Grievance Redressal Policy Privacy Policy|Feedback Copyright © 2019 Bennett Coleman & Co. All rights reserved. Powered by Indiatimes.
Justices G.R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the petitioners from Madurai district to vacate the premises in six months April 15, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published April 15, 2023
In view of the said submissions made by the learned Additional Advocate General as well as the learned counsel for the fourth respondent Municipality and after having gone through the copy of the G.O. as well as the compliance affidavit filed by the third respondent and the proceedings issued by the fourth respondent, I am of the view that, since the order of the writ Court have been complied with, this contempt petition need not be persuaded further. 5. With the result, this contempt petition is liable to be closed, accordingly, it is closed. 04.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji To 1. Mr.Shiv Das Meena, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 2. Mr.Kumar Jayant, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 3. Mr.P.Ponniah, I.A.S., The Director of Municipal Administration, 11th Floor, Urban Administrative Building, Opposite to CIBA Building, Santhome High Road, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. 4. Mrs.Sudha, The Commissioner, Namakkal Municipality, Namakkal – 637 001. R.SURESH KUMAR, J. vji Cont.P.No.1838 of 2022 in W.P.No.16511 of 2021 04.10.2023 October 20, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published October 20, 2023
சான்றிதழ்கள் வழங்கி, பணம் சம்பாதிக்கும் நோக்கத்துடனே நிகர்நிலை பல்கலைகழகங்கள் செயல்படுவதாக அதிருப்தி தெரிவித்துள்ள சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், svnj bench January 4, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published January 4, 2022