You may also like...
-
7 law tips today [16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : indus biotech pvt ltd vs kotak india venture ( off shore ) fund civil appeal no 1070 of 2021 dated 26- 03- 2021 : Arbitration reference not maintainable if filed after admission of application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution admitted[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : The state of Rajasthan & others vs love kush meena civil appeal no 3894 of 2020 dated 24 – 03 – 2021 : Acquittal from criminal case charged with serious offences based on benefit of doubt not create opportunity for candidate to join service[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : The state of Rajasthan & others vs love kush meena civil appeal no 3894 of 2020 dated 24 – 03 – 2021 : Acquittal from criminal case charged with serious offences based on benefit of doubt not create opportunity or make a candidate eligible for appointment[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Md misher ali @ meser ali vs union of india civil appeal no 1058 – 1059 of 2021 dated 24- 03- 2021 : Appearance of notice to be served by investigating agency at place where petitioner is permanently residing[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 577 ( DB ) : Enkay visions p ltd vs doordarshan rep by its director general : Awarding interest in money suit from date of decree restricts fruits of decree and defeats interest of justice ( section 34 CPC 1908 )[16/05, 11:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Ram kishan vs state of Rajasthan & others criminal appeal no 393 of 2021 dated 9- 04 – 2021 : No quashing of FIR on grounds that it was not registered immediatly ( sec 482 CRPC )
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 16, 2024
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1729512992440475876?t=n0pncL_ek4Tu_FOso0Y96w&s=08 As a result, the judgement of conviction is set aside. The order of acquittal from the charge under Section 120B of IPC is confirmed. The fine amount paid if any shall be refunded back to the accused. Bail bond executed if any shall stand discharged. 28.11.2023 Index:yes Internet:yes/no Speaking order/non speaking order Neutral citation:yes/no ari To: 1.IX Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,SPE/CBI/ACB, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. ari delivery Common Judgment made in Crl.A.Nos.229, 233, 249 and 258 of 2014 and Crl.A.No.1 of 2015 28.11.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 62/62 for petner former pp rajarathnam senior adv
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 28, 2023
-
Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: 1 order 45 rule 13(1) ( 2(c))
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 28, 2020