Author: Sekar Reporter

judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To

judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To

2024:MHC:1949IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 12.03.2024Pronounced on : 29.04.2024CORAM:THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULAW.P. Nos.19622 of 2020 & 169, 170, 3398, 25424 & 3402 of 2021 andW.MP.Nos.24249 of 2020, 3880, 3884,...

CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024

CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 26.03.2024 Delivered on 30.04.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARWP.Nos.13419 & 13437/2017 andWMP.Nos.14464, 14465, 14492 & 14493/2017WP.No.13419/2017:-M/s.Global Waste Recyclers Ltd No.5/245,...

Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating

Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating

[03/05, 10:28] Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a...

Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.

Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 27.03.2024 DELIVERED ON: 23.04.2024 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.Nos.20553, 22931 of 2023; 6667 of 2013; 6561,...

In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.

In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders reserved on: 11.03.2024 Orders pronounced on: 23.04.2024 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.Nos.3985 and 7400 of 2020;15611, 21340,...

Cmda 2nd master plan order setaside அதிரடி உத்தரவு நீதிபதிகள் எஸ்.எஸ்.சுந்தர் மற்றும் என்.செந்தில்குமார் அடங்கிய அமர்வு, மிகப்பெரிய நிலப்பரப்பை நீர்பிடிப்பு பகுதி என அறிவித்தது அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு எதிரானது என உத்தரவிட்டது.

Cmda 2nd master plan order setaside அதிரடி உத்தரவு நீதிபதிகள் எஸ்.எஸ்.சுந்தர் மற்றும் என்.செந்தில்குமார் அடங்கிய அமர்வு, மிகப்பெரிய நிலப்பரப்பை நீர்பிடிப்பு பகுதி என அறிவித்தது அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு எதிரானது என உத்தரவிட்டது.

சென்னை பெருநகர இரண்டாவது முழுமைத் திட்டத்தின் (மாஸ்டர் பிளான்) அடிப்படையில், புறநகர் பகுதியில் உள்ள 27 கிராமங்களில் உள்ள 13 ஆயிரத்து 720 ெஹக்டேர் நிலப்பரப்பை செங்குன்றம் ஏரி நீர்பிடிப்பு பகுதி என அறிவித்து சென்னை பெருநகர வளர்ச்சிக் குழுமம் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு விரோதமானது...

02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.

02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.

[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given...