Follow:
- Next story The primary point of reference revolved Mr. ISAAC MOHANLALaround the issue as to whether an opportunity to the State to file a Written President of MMBACounter is mandatory and whether thetime limit for such opportunity should (Madurai Bench of Madras necessarily be four weeks in all cases. High Court Bar Association)Justice Dr. G.Jeyachandran, however, framed two points and answered them :(i) Whether the Bench could decide the case before the expiration of four weeks and without a Counter by the State, and (ii) Whether the verdict by one Judge on merits and postponement by the other Judge could be construed as a Judgment.01
- Previous story justice R Suresh Kumar and justice G Arul Murugan observed that compassionate appointment is not a vested right and the application seeking the same cannot be made after a long delay, which is not the purpose for which the scheme is provided.”
Recent Posts
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.30639 of 2017A.Radhakrishnan Petitioner Vs.1.The Commissioner of Land Administration,Chepuak,Chennai – 600 005.2.The Commissioner,Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High
- The Madras High Court has held that mere possession of tainted money is sufficient to invoke the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the burden to prove the innocence lies upon the persons facing money-laundering charges.
More
Recent Posts
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.30639 of 2017A.Radhakrishnan Petitioner Vs.1.The Commissioner of Land Administration,Chepuak,Chennai – 600 005.2.The Commissioner,Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High
- The Madras High Court has held that mere possession of tainted money is sufficient to invoke the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the burden to prove the innocence lies upon the persons facing money-laundering charges.