Follow:
- Next story அதிமுக ஆட்சியில் நடைபெற்ற சுடுகாட்டு கூரை ஊழல் வழக்கில் விதிக்கப்பட்ட 2 ஆண்டுகள் சிறை தண்டனையை எதிர்த்து முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் செல்வகணபதி உள்ளிட்டோர் தாக்கல் செய்த மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுக்கள்
- Previous story State pp jinna letter / மாண்புமிகு தமிழ்நாடு முதலமைச்சர் அவர்கள் 04.09.2022 அன்று சென்னை உயர்நீதி மன்ற வளாகத்தில் நடைபெற்ற ஒருங்கிணைந்த நீதிமன்றக் கட்டிட அடிக்கல் நாட்டு விழாவில் கலந்து கொண்டு உரையாற்றியபோது, “நீதித்துறையின் ஒரு தீர்ப்பு அல்ல, ஒற்றைச் சொல்லையும் மதிக்கும் அரசாக இவ்வரசு செயல்பட்டு வருகிறது என குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார்“. அதனடிப்படையிலும் நீதிமன்றத்தின் பரிந்துரையின் அடிப்படையிலும் இவ்வழக்கினை சிறப்பு நேர்வாகக் கருதி சட்டப்படி முடித்து வைக்க தமிழ்நாடு காவல் துறை தலைமை இயக்குநர் மற்றும் காவல் துறை படைத்தலைவர் அவர்களை அறிவுறுத்தியுள்ளார்.
Recent Posts
- Consider and pass order /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAMWP No.34387 of 2023Tamil Nadu Palli Mattrum Kaloori KalviThiraipada Amaippalargal Sangam,(Tamil Nadu Schooll annd College EducationalFilm Organisation Society),(Registration No.214/2015)Represented by its President
- bar council vice chairman karthikeyan speech வக்கீல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி
- judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To
- CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024
- today law tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: THE HON’BLE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN R.MALA CASE REPORTED IN 2007 (3) LW 68 HELD THAT: –
More
Recent Posts
- Consider and pass order /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAMWP No.34387 of 2023Tamil Nadu Palli Mattrum Kaloori KalviThiraipada Amaippalargal Sangam,(Tamil Nadu Schooll annd College EducationalFilm Organisation Society),(Registration No.214/2015)Represented by its President
- bar council vice chairman karthikeyan speech வக்கீல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி
- judge manjula order In the result,(i) W.P.No.25424 of 2021 is allowed and the impugned government order issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.(3D) No.3 School Education [SE(1)] Department, dated 13.07.2021 is quashed and the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to re-do the exercise by rightly issuing two separate selection lists one for the open category and another for the teacher category by following the communal reservation in accordance with the vacancies earmarked as against each community or priority and complete the exercise and issue the revised selection list within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(ii) W.P.Nos.19622 of 2020 and 169, 170, 3398,and 3402 of 2021 are also disposed with the abovedirection.(iii) No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.04.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes/No jrs To
- CONCLUSION:-(97)For all the above reasons, the writ petitions stand allowed and the impugned order dated 26.04.2017 in Letter No.24801/UD-VII[1]/2016-3 is hereby quashed. The clarification of limited extent of 13,720 Hectares of lands as catchment area as per Second Master Plan is declared unconstitutional. However, it is open to the respondents to revise the Master Plan taking note of this judgment and in the light of the recommendations of M/s.CUBE in their Final Report strictly adhering to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The respondents shall consult experts and provide necessary infrastructure to ensure protection of water bodies throughout the area where the jurisdiction of CMDA is extended and supply of quality drinking water in sufficient quantity. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.[S.S.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.]30.04.2024
- today law tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: THE HON’BLE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN R.MALA CASE REPORTED IN 2007 (3) LW 68 HELD THAT: –