Follow:
- Next story Justice T Raja and Justice B Pugalendhi directed the police officials to produce the petitioner’s father before the court on January 9 failing which the Ramanathapuram superintendent of police should appear before the court to explain about the status of the case.
- Previous story Justices T S Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbaroyan, which resumed the hearing in the case on December 16 after a gap of over three months, reserved the order as both sides completed their arguments. Before reserving the verdict, the bench also handed out an assurance that they will try to deliver the judgement as early as possible. While Sterlite argued reopening of the plant, which is shut since April 2018, the Tamil Nadu government wanted the smelter to remain shut
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
More
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?