![[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1700680249410031778?t=RDea75vMnbyK0g3-OLm_zA&s=08 [9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: 32.Consequently, applying the Law discussed above to the facts of the present case, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The FIR having been registered, in this case, within two days from the date of the accident on 13.10.2022 by Oragadam Police Station, the petition filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.(SR).No.3280 of 2023 has to only be treated as a reminder to the Court to call for the FIR and other reports and register the same as a Claim Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is set aside and a direction shall be issued to treat the application filed on 19.04.2023 as a reminder to the Court for a plea of just compensation under 166(4) and take up the application for trial. No Costs. 18.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mps To The Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J, mps Pre-Delivery Order in C.R.P.No.2558 of 2023 18.08.2023 https://sekarreporter.com/32-consequently-applying-the-law-discussed-above-to-the-facts-of-the-present-case-this-civil-revision-petition-is-allowed-the-fir-having-been-registered-in-this-case-within-two-days-from-the-date/
- Previous story 32.Consequently, applying the Law discussed above to the facts of the present case, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The FIR having been registered, in this case, within two days from the date of the accident on 13.10.2022 by Oragadam Police Station, the petition filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.(SR).No.3280 of 2023 has to only be treated as a reminder to the Court to call for the FIR and other reports and register the same as a Claim Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is set aside and a direction shall be issued to treat the application filed on 19.04.2023 as a reminder to the Court for a plea of just compensation under 166(4) and take up the application for trial. No Costs. 18.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mps To The Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J, mps Pre-Delivery Order in C.R.P.No.2558 of 2023 18.08.2023
Recent Posts
- today tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE MEDICAL EXPENSES WILL BE REIMBURSED WHEN THE PENSIONER TAKEN A TREATMENT IN NON-NETWORKING HOSPITAL?
- கோர்ட்டுக்கு வந்த சவுக்கு சங்கர் – பார்த்தவுடன் நீதிபதிகள் போட்ட உத்தரவு
- (no title)
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
More
Recent Posts
- today tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE MEDICAL EXPENSES WILL BE REIMBURSED WHEN THE PENSIONER TAKEN A TREATMENT IN NON-NETWORKING HOSPITAL?
- கோர்ட்டுக்கு வந்த சவுக்கு சங்கர் – பார்த்தவுடன் நீதிபதிகள் போட்ட உத்தரவு
- (no title)
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).