You may also like...
Follow:
- Next story Don’t interfere with transfer of doctors, govt. urges High Court:
- Previous story In a relief to an income tax assessee whose premises were raided along with that of state health minister C Vijayabaskar in April 2017, leading to the cancellation of bypoll to RK Nagar constituency, the Madras high court has stayed all recovery proceedings against the assessee.Justice Anitha Sumanth, before whom the case came up for hearing on Friday, directed the income tax to file its reply by February 24, and added: “Let no recovery proceedings be initiated till then.” The petitioner approached the court challenging the assessment order of deputy commissioner of income tax, central circle for the year 2018-19, assessing his total income as Rs 4,52,48,500, including the amount seized at the time of search.
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
More
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C: