You may also like...
-
Madras High Court refused to grant injunction to the release the film Valimai in OTT Platform on 25.3.2022. Case filed by metro film producer. Justice Senthil kumar Ramamoorthy held that no prima facie case made out for infringement of copyright by the petitioner. Vijayan Subramanian appeared for Director H.Vinoth.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 22, 2022
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1729843527050260928?t=p0teMB6SAuOKvW4s0PXu-g&s=08 Full order 22.In the light of above discussions, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Letter No.TNRERA/6579/2020 dated 10.03.2021. If the petitioner is intending to deal with the property by selling plots to third parties, the petitioner has to register himself with RERA by submitting application and thereafter, the petitioner can always sell the plots to third parties. 23.The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index :Yes / No 16.10.2023 Internet :Yes NCC : Yes/No cmr To 1.The Chairperson, Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), 1st Floor, No.1-A, Gandhi-Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai โ 600 008. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai -28. 3.The District Registrar, O/o. the District Registrar Office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 4.The Sub Registrar, Thiruvadanai Sub Registrar Office, Taluk Office Complex, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. cmr W.P.(MD)No.10402 of 2021 16.10.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 29, 2023
-
Case quashed The Madras High Court had ordered Vijay Sethupathi Film Company, Maithiri Movie Makers who produced the Telugu film, and director Bhujji Babu Sana to respond to the case filed by Prabhu Dalhousie. The case came up for hearing today before Judge C Saravanan. At the time of hearing Narmada Sampath appeared on behalf of Vijay Sethupathi ,moved Application to Strike out the Plaint against Mr.Vijay Sethupathi .she submited as far as his case is concerned , the main contentions were that there is no cause of aution against mr. vijay sethupathi and entire pleadings in the plaint are based on a the news paper report which again reiterates a fact that based on a source it is believed that vijay sethupathi has purchased the copy rights of Tamil version of uppena movie. Apart from that no other material records have been filed to substantiate the claim of the plaint against mr. vijay sethupathi she added. After hearing the submissions judge allowed the strike out petition to strike off the plaint against mr. vijay sethupathi And the case id posted tomorrow for other defendants submission
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 19, 2022