Follow:
- Next story Sathya studio case appeal acj bench granted statusco
- Previous story 13.The case on hand does not deal with any major alteration as contemplated under Section 52(1) of the Act supra. The alterations have been made only to adapt the vehicle to make it more user friendly for the petitioner, who is physically challenged to make ingress and egress into and out of the vehicle easier. Neither the definition under Section 2(1) nor Section 52 specifies that it is the person, for whose purpose, the adaption is made, who should ride the vehicle. On the contrary, the definition of adapted vehicle makes it clear that the vehicle should be used solely by or “for such person”. Therefore, in the instant case, the adaption is made for the use of the petitioner and taking into account the Government Order, which provides for the exemption, the Writ Petition is allowed, directing the respondent/Registering Authority to apply the Government Order referred supra and grant exemption to the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Speaking : Yes / No 13.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To 1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Transport, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.The Assistant Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Tanjore District. 4.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Pudukkottai 622 005. 5.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Pudukottai District. P.T.ASHA, J. mm W.P.(MD) No.1480 of 2023 13.03.2023
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol
More
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol