![[6/11, 18:52] Sekarreporter 1: [6/11, 18:43] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sureshkumarTOI/status/1271065590199771137?s=08 [6/11, 18:43] Sekarreporter 1: As #SupremeCourt refused to hear pleas moved by #TN political parties seeking #OBCreservation in all India quota for #Medical admission, @arivalayam has moved the #Madrashighcourt with a similar plea [6/11, 18:52] Sekarreporter 1: [6/11, 18:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/imranhindu/status/1271064463077076992?s=08 [6/11, 18:45] Sekarreporter 1: Within hours after withdrawing it’s writ petition from Supreme Court, DMK has moved the Madras HC seeking 50% reservations for OBCs in PG medical & dental seats surrendered by TN Govt to the All India quota @THChennai [6/11, 18:52] Sekarreporter 1: [6/11, 18:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/harismurali/status/1271065522151387136?s=08 [6/11, 18:44] Sekarreporter 1: Pursuant to the leave granted by #Supreme Court this morning #DMK has filed a petition before the #Madras High court seeking for 50% #OBC reservation in #Medical and #Dental seats surrendered by the state in All India quota @xpresstn](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story எனது வாழ்கை எப்படி இந்த வக்கீல் தொழிலில் எதிர் நீச்சல் போட்டேன்மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் ஆர்.வைகை
- Previous story Justice SM Subramaniam also directed the home secretary and the DGP to verify the mandatory declarations given by police officials periodically across the state with reference to Rule 9 of the Tamil Nadu Subordinate Police Officers Conduct Rules and verify the genuineness of such declarations, including assets purchased in the name of family members, relatives, and persons known to them. In the event of any discrepancies, all appropriate action must be taken, including confiscation of wealth accumulated illegally through corrupt practices, the judge said.
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
More
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.