Law 5 tips Vinothpandian: AIR 1978 ALL 195 : simplex concrete vs S Ahmed : summons served with no copy of plaint ,defendant had full knowledge of the date of hearing held no sufficient cause ,ex parte decree cannot be set aside

[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 1978 ALL 195 : simplex concrete vs S Ahmed : summons served with no copy of plaint ,defendant had full knowledge of the date of hearing held no sufficient cause ,ex parte decree cannot be set aside
[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 chh 120 : Balaram Rathor vs sub – divisional officer bilaspur : A party is not debarred from examining it’s opponent as a witness on his behalf
[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 1988 kant 93 :Syed haisanulla vs Ahmad baig : summons in English on a person ignorant about the language when is served entailing non – appearance of defendant ,it is a sufficient cause
[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 337 SC : fazalullah Khan vs M Akbhar contractor : interim orders granted by supreme court not automatically vacated beyond six months period ,such interim order must continue to be in force till appeal decided
[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 1999 Raj 100 : Champa Lal vs Amar Chand : court should not allow defendants petition for directing plaintiff to produce all his witnesses on a single day
[10/21, 10:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 Hyd 88 : sirangai Shoba vs sirangi Muralidhar rao : The words witness in attendance are to be understood as person being present and it need not be physical presence

You may also like...