law tips Vinothpandian: AIR 2019 SC 1692 : kaikhosrou ( chick ) kavasji framji vs union of india : Petition to question legality and correctness of notice issued under any act not barred under writ jurisdiction

[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: AIR 2019 SC 1692 : kaikhosrou ( chick ) kavasji framji vs union of india : Petition to question legality and correctness of notice issued under any act not barred under writ jurisdiction
[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2014(2) DRTC 810 : Dena bank vs AAIFR & others : An interim order to stay section 13(4) SARFASI proceedings is only an aid or an arrangement which entitles parties to main proceedings to work out modalities till final adjudication , till measures themselves are set aside under sec 13(4) it cannot be said to be invalid or illegal
[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 673 : K padma vs K Ramachandran & others : Property attached in favour of bank earlier to alleged agreement for sale , provisions of sec 64 of CPC not applicable
[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 626 : Dhurga vaishnavi shivamoorthi vs murthy : conduct of accused subsequent to release on bail and supervening circumstances alone relevant for cancellation of bail ( sec 439 (2) CRPC 1973 )
[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 442 : Nissan motors corporate office vs S giri prasad : summoning of an accused in a criminal case a serious matter , summoning order must reflect about application of mind to facts of case and law applicable thereto , when magistrate did not record basis of taking cognizance and simply ordered to issue summons to accused , complaint held liable to be quashed
[10/3, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )