Follow:
- Next story W.P.No.34845 of 2018 and Crl. O.P.No.23428 of 2018 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. —-+minister velumani case order—No view is expressed at this stage, particularly since this Bench has not dealt with the matter previously. Since the State election is round the corner, it may not be appropriate to take up this matter before the summer vacation. It is also made clear that the mere pendency of this matter should not be regarded as any adverse inference being drawn against the concerned Minister just as the writ petitioner suggests that mere obtaining of the inquiry report does not absolve the concerned person. The matter will appear at least three weeks after the summer vacation.
- Previous story Coopertive case full order THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.21440, 21441, 21442/2015, 18263, 27535/2010, 14726, 15943, 15944, 15945, 34257, 34260, 34258, 34259/2012,—+++The benefit of regularization that is extended to the eligible Petitioners/Respondent Employee, as the case may be shall also be extended to all those employees who are similarly placed even though they have not knocked the doors of this Court.
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
More
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial