SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Vijaya narayanan senior adv தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரி தரப்பில் ஆஜரான மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர், 50 சதவீத இடங்களுக்கு அரசு கட்டணத்தை வசூலிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற உத்தரவின் கீழ் முதலில் அரசு ஒதுக்கீட்டு மாணவர்களுக்கு வழங்க வேண்டும் என உத்தரவிடப்பட்டுள்ளது… இரு பிரிவு மாணவர்களிடம் இரு வேறு கட்டணம் வசூலிப்பது பாரபட்சமானது. அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு விரோதமானது என்றார்

Uncategorized

Vijaya narayanan senior adv தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரி தரப்பில் ஆஜரான மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர், 50 சதவீத இடங்களுக்கு அரசு கட்டணத்தை வசூலிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற உத்தரவின் கீழ் முதலில் அரசு ஒதுக்கீட்டு மாணவர்களுக்கு வழங்க வேண்டும் என உத்தரவிடப்பட்டுள்ளது… இரு பிரிவு மாணவர்களிடம் இரு வேறு கட்டணம் வசூலிப்பது பாரபட்சமானது. அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு விரோதமானது என்றார்

தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரிகளில் 50 சதவீத மாணவர்களிடம் அரசு கட்டணத்தையே வசூலிக்க வேண்டும் என்றால், மீதமுள்ள 50 சதவீத மாணவர்களிடம் 50 முதல் 60 லட்சம் ரூபாய் வரை வசூலிக்க வேண்டி வரும் என, தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரிகள் தரப்பில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டது. நாடு முழுவதும் உள்ள தனியார்...

prima facie motive or material, as to any fraudulent or dishonest intention or any act which is perse violative of Section 43 of the Act, thepetitioner/accused No.4 has been dragged into the case. Therefore, this is a fit case for discharge of the petitioner andaccordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed on the following terms:- the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Alandur in Crl.M.P.No.1475 of 2020 in C.C.No.876 of 2020, dated 18.04.2022 is setaside; the petitioner/accused No.4 is discharged from C.C.No.876 of 2020; Consequently, Crl.M.P.Nos.6724, 6726 and 10513 of 2022 are closed. 05.08.2022 Index       : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. The Inspector of Police,     Central Crime Branch,     CCB-II, Vepery,     Chennai – 600 007. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs      Pre-Delivery Order in Crl.R.C.No.642 of 2022 05.08.2022 [1] (2010) 9 SCC 368. Petitioner             : Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan For Respondent         : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Uncategorized

prima facie motive or material, as to any fraudulent or dishonest intention or any act which is perse violative of Section 43 of the Act, thepetitioner/accused No.4 has been dragged into the case. Therefore, this is a fit case for discharge of the petitioner andaccordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed on the following terms:- the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Alandur in Crl.M.P.No.1475 of 2020 in C.C.No.876 of 2020, dated 18.04.2022 is setaside; the petitioner/accused No.4 is discharged from C.C.No.876 of 2020; Consequently, Crl.M.P.Nos.6724, 6726 and 10513 of 2022 are closed. 05.08.2022 Index       : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. The Inspector of Police,     Central Crime Branch,     CCB-II, Vepery,     Chennai – 600 007. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs      Pre-Delivery Order in Crl.R.C.No.642 of 2022 05.08.2022 [1] (2010) 9 SCC 368. Petitioner             : Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan For Respondent         : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders Reserved on :  25.07.2022 Orders Pronounced on : 05.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.642 of 2022 R.Seshadri           .. Petitioner   Versus...

In view of the aforesaid findings, both the Crl.A.Nos.898 and 829 of 2019 are without any merits and the Trial Court has imposed only the minimum sentence for both the offenses and therefore, the judgment of the Trial Court does not call for any interference. The Criminal Appeals stand dismissed.  Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.7429 of 2020 is closed. 05.08.2022 Index       : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order kmk/grs D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., kmk/grs To The Special Judge, I Additional Special Court     for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act,     Chennai. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, NIB CID, Chennai. Pre-Delivery Judgment in Crl.A.Nos.829 and 898 of 2019 05.08.2022 [1] (2011) 11 SCC 653 [2] (2020) 2 SCC 290 [3] (2008) 16 SCC 417 [4] (2017) 13 SCC 636 [5] (2008) 4 SCC 54 [6] (2018) 17 SCC 627 [7] (2020) 10 SCC 120

Uncategorized

In view of the aforesaid findings, both the Crl.A.Nos.898 and 829 of 2019 are without any merits and the Trial Court has imposed only the minimum sentence for both the offenses and therefore, the judgment of the Trial Court does not call for any interference. The Criminal Appeals stand dismissed.  Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.7429 of 2020 is closed. 05.08.2022 Index       : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order kmk/grs D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., kmk/grs To The Special Judge, I Additional Special Court     for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act,     Chennai. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, NIB CID, Chennai. Pre-Delivery Judgment in Crl.A.Nos.829 and 898 of 2019 05.08.2022 [1] (2011) 11 SCC 653 [2] (2020) 2 SCC 290 [3] (2008) 16 SCC 417 [4] (2017) 13 SCC 636 [5] (2008) 4 SCC 54 [6] (2018) 17 SCC 627 [7] (2020) 10 SCC 120

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 12.07.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 05.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.Nos.829 and 898 of 2019 Ramesh, Son of Rajendran...

is now reported to this Court that the appellants in all the cases have remitted the fine amount of Rs.2,000/- and therefore, the appellants are purged of contempt accepting the payment of fine,  pursuant to the direction of the learned single Judge. 30.With the above directions, these Contempt Appeals are disposed Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.S.S.R.J.,)       (S.S.Y.J.,)     08.08.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:yes Ns S.S. SUNDAR, J., and S.SRIMATHY,J.,

Uncategorized

is now reported to this Court that the appellants in all the cases have remitted the fine amount of Rs.2,000/- and therefore, the appellants are purged of contempt accepting the payment of fine,  pursuant to the direction of the learned single Judge. 30.With the above directions, these Contempt Appeals are disposed Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.S.S.R.J.,)       (S.S.Y.J.,)     08.08.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:yes Ns S.S. SUNDAR, J., and S.SRIMATHY,J.,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on :  11.07.2022 Delivered on :  08.08.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Cont.A(MD)Nos.3 to 10 of 2022 in Cont...

JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE C.R.P.(PD) No.2532 of 2021 and C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2372 & 2373 of 2021 and CMP. Nos.18968 of 2021, 18044 of 2021 & 18046 of 2021 C.R.P.(PD) No.2532 of 2021 : J.Thennarasu    … Petitioner / Petitioner / Responden. For Petitioner            : Mr.K.F.Manavalan                              For Respondent        : Mr.T.Jayaramaraj   Mr.Sharath Chandran, Amicus Curiae C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2372 & 2373  of 2021:                                  For Petitioners          : Mr.Na.Malaisaravanan (in both CRPs)                              For Respondents       : Mr.P.B.Balaji (in both CRPs) COMMON   ORDER t

Uncategorized

JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE C.R.P.(PD) No.2532 of 2021 and C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2372 & 2373 of 2021 and CMP. Nos.18968 of 2021, 18044 of 2021 & 18046 of 2021 C.R.P.(PD) No.2532 of 2021 : J.Thennarasu    … Petitioner / Petitioner / Responden. For Petitioner            : Mr.K.F.Manavalan                              For Respondent        : Mr.T.Jayaramaraj   Mr.Sharath Chandran, Amicus Curiae C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2372 & 2373  of 2021:                                  For Petitioners          : Mr.Na.Malaisaravanan (in both CRPs)                              For Respondents       : Mr.P.B.Balaji (in both CRPs) COMMON   ORDER t

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 20.04.2022 Pronounced on : 05.08.2022 CORAM :  JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE C.R.P.(PD) No.2532 of 2021 and C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2372 & 2373 of 2021 and CMP. Nos.18968...

சமூக ஊடகங்கள் வாயிலான குற்றச்செயல்களை ஒழுங்குபடுத்துவது தொடர்பாக திரு.பி.வில்சன் அவர்கள் பாராளுமன்றத்தில் இன்று சிறப்புத் தீர்மானம்!

Uncategorized

சமூக ஊடகங்கள் வாயிலான குற்றச்செயல்களை ஒழுங்குபடுத்துவது தொடர்பாக திரு.பி.வில்சன் அவர்கள் பாராளுமன்றத்தில் இன்று சிறப்புத் தீர்மானம்!

சமூக ஊடகங்கள் வாயிலான குற்றச்செயல்களை ஒழுங்குபடுத்துவது தொடர்பாக திரு.பி.வில்சன் அவர்கள் பாராளுமன்றத்தில் இன்று சிறப்புத் தீர்மானம்! வதந்திகள் மற்றும் வெறுப்புப் பிரச்சாரத்தை பரப்புவதற்கு தீய சக்திகள் சமூக ஊடகங்களை பயன்படுத்துகின்றன என்பது பொதுவான அம்சமாகும்.. இந்த சமூக ஊடக வலைதளங்கள் வார்த்தைகள், சொற்றொடர்களை பகுப்பாய்வு செய்ய படிமுறைத்தீர்வுகளை...

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala   for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .

Uncategorized

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala   for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.Additional Director General of Police,    Economic Offences Wing,    Anna Nagar, Chennai...

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar to cause a survey of the land in question, as requested by the HR & CE Department, and send the report at the earliest, in any case not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.  In case any encroachment is reported, the HR & CE Department would proceed to remove the encroachment by taking the process, as provided under the provisions of HR & CE Act, 1959.  There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                              

Uncategorized

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar to cause a survey of the land in question, as requested by the HR & CE Department, and send the report at the earliest, in any case not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.  In case any encroachment is reported, the HR & CE Department would proceed to remove the encroachment by taking the process, as provided under the provisions of HR & CE Act, 1959.  There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                              

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:   04.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.19869 of 2022 A.Radhakrishnan      … Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary...