SEKAR REPORTER Blog

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR  S.A.No.1609 of 2000  1.Smartha Brahims Living in the    State of Tamil Nadu Practising.   Mr.B.Kumar    Senior Counsel    For Mr.R.Kannan           For R1  	  : Mr.Sankaranarayanan    Additional Solicitor General of India    Assisted by Mr.G.Raja Raman    Central Govt.Standing Counsel      For R2 & R3  	  : Mr.G.Siva Raja    Government Advocate  JUDGMENT

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR S.A.No.1609 of 2000 1.Smartha Brahims Living in the    State of Tamil Nadu Practising. Mr.B.Kumar   Senior Counsel   For Mr.R.Kannan      For R1 : Mr.Sankaranarayanan   Additional Solicitor General of India   Assisted by Mr.G.Raja Raman   Central Govt.Standing Counsel  For R2 & R3 : Mr.G.Siva Raja   Government Advocate JUDGMENT

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT JUDGMENT RESERVED ON      :  27.01.2022  JUDGMENT PRONOUNDED ON :   07 .06.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR S.A.No.1609 of 2000 1.Smartha Brahims Living in the    State of...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 U.Manickavel	..	Petitioner vs.   For Petitioner	:  Mr.M.Deivanandam 	For Respondents	          :  Mr.S.Prabhakaran,                                                                 Government Advocate. INTERIM ORDER Mr.Mathew David, Assistant Commissioner, Estate Welfare and Community Policing, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007, is present.

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 U.Manickavel .. Petitioner vs. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Deivanandam For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabhakaran, Government Advocate. INTERIM ORDER Mr.Mathew David, Assistant Commissioner, Estate Welfare and Community Policing, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007, is present.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14-06-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 U.Manickavel .. Petitioner vs. 1.State Represented by The Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise...

#BREAKING : காவல்துறையினர் மீதான குற்றச்சாட்டுகள் சமீபத்தில் அதிகமாக உள்ளது பொறுத்துக்கொள்ள முடியாது – சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் எச்சரிக்கை   #ChennaiHC | #TNPolice   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.5885 of 2014 A.Shanmugam	.. vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,    Crime Branch, CID.   For Petitioner	:  Mr.I.Kabilan for                                                                 Mr.M.Ravi 	For Respondents	:  Ms.S.Anitha,                                                                 Special Government Pleader. O R D E R  ,

#BREAKING : காவல்துறையினர் மீதான குற்றச்சாட்டுகள் சமீபத்தில் அதிகமாக உள்ளது பொறுத்துக்கொள்ள முடியாது – சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் எச்சரிக்கை #ChennaiHC | #TNPolice HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.5885 of 2014 A.Shanmugam .. vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch, CID. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Kabilan for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : Ms.S.Anitha, Special Government Pleader. O R D E R ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09-06-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.5885 of 2014 A.Shanmugam .. vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch, CID, O/o.The...

Former Madras High Court judge Justice K  Chandru & senior counsel Sriram Panchu have signed a joint appeal made by retired judges of the Supreme Court & various High Courts as well as eminent lawyers urging CJI to take suo motu cognisance of recent happenings in Up

Former Madras High Court judge Justice K Chandru & senior counsel Sriram Panchu have signed a joint appeal made by retired judges of the Supreme Court & various High Courts as well as eminent lawyers urging CJI to take suo motu cognisance of recent happenings in Up

[6/14, 15:12] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1536645069167464448?t=Oax1U0aqvSHMMesyCxZECQ&s=08 [6/14, 15:12] Sekarreporter: Former Madras High Court judge Justice K Chandru & senior counsel Sriram Panchu have signed a joint appeal made by retired judges of the Supreme Court &...

honble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan and Honble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad related to limitation  for pasing final orders under the income tax act     honble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan and Honble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad related to limitation  for pasing final orders under the income tax act   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 1517, 1519, 1609, 1610 and 1854 of 2021 and  CMP. Nos.9656, 9658, 10022, 10023 and 11720 of 2021

honble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan and Honble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad related to limitation for pasing final orders under the income tax act honble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan and Honble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad related to limitation for pasing final orders under the income tax act HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 1517, 1519, 1609, 1610 and 1854 of 2021 and CMP. Nos.9656, 9658, 10022, 10023 and 11720 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.06.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 1517, 1519, 1609, 1610...

In the case of CIT v. Roca Bathroom Products Pvt Limited and another (WA.1517 of 2021 etc. batch), a Division Bench of Madras High Court consisting of the Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.Mahadevan and the Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad, rendered a noteworthy judgment touching the issues related to limitation for passing final orders and defining the reasonable time for the same and issued the following directions:

In the case of CIT v. Roca Bathroom Products Pvt Limited and another (WA.1517 of 2021 etc. batch), a Division Bench of Madras High Court consisting of the Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.Mahadevan and the Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad, rendered a noteworthy judgment touching the issues related to limitation for passing final orders and defining the reasonable time for the same and issued the following directions:

In the case of CIT v. Roca Bathroom Products Pvt Limited and another (WA.1517 of 2021 etc. batch), a Division Bench of Madras High Court consisting of the Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.Mahadevan and the...

Sekarreporter whatsapp court orders

Sekarreporter whatsapp court orders

[6/13, 12:22] Sekarreporter: [6/13, 12:03] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1536234738608132096?t=O1gfI3uvFcfLleembzoc8w&s=08 [6/13, 12:03] Sekarreporter: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD T.C.A.No.184 of 2012 M/s.Fenner (India) Limited, No.3, Madurai Melakkal Road, https://sekarreporter.com/honble-mr-justice-r-mahadevan-and-the-honble-mr-justice-j-sathya-narayana-prasad-t-c-a-no-184-of-2012-m-s-fenner-india-limited-no-3-madurai-melakkal-road/ [6/13,...

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD T.C.A.No.184 of 2012 M/s.Fenner (India) Limited.  For Appellant 	:	Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar For Respondent	:	Mr.M.Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel and Mrs.V.Pushpa, Junior Standing Counsel JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN, J. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Income   ,

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD T.C.A.No.184 of 2012 M/s.Fenner (India) Limited. For Appellant : Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar For Respondent : Mr.M.Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel and Mrs.V.Pushpa, Junior Standing Counsel JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN, J. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Income ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.06.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD T.C.A.No.184 of 2012 M/s.Fenner (India) Limited, No.3, Madurai Melakkal...

MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 1903 of 2021 — M/s. Virtusa Consulting Services Private     : reference under section 92CA, was made beyond the period of limitation – claim of the assessee was allowed.   Appellant 	: 	Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Counsel  		 for Mr. Srinath Sridevan For Respondents	:	Mr. Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar Standing Counsel for Income Tax JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 1903 of 2021 — M/s. Virtusa Consulting Services Private : reference under section 92CA, was made beyond the period of limitation – claim of the assessee was allowed. Appellant : Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Counsel for Mr. Srinath Sridevan For Respondents : Mr. Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar Standing Counsel for Income Tax JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.06.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 1903 of 2021 —...