You may also like...
-
Sv jayaraman ஆழ்ந்த சிவில் சட்ட அறிவு, மாமனிதன் Kalaimani mhaa advocate வாழ்த்துரை
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 11, 2020
-
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Writ Appeal Nos. 685, 694, 695, 696 and 697 of 2020 Online booking charges or Internet handling charges besides cost of ticket for cinema cannot be included for imposition of entertainment tax. Its a separate service which is not uniformly charged from all cine goers as mandatory payment for entertainment. Madras HC DB decision dt. 15.10. 2020.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 15, 2020
-
[7/10, 15:19] sekarreporter1: [7/10, 15:04] sekarreporter1: சென்னை மெரினாவில் பேனா நினைவு சின்னத்திற்கு எதிரான வழக்கை தள்ளுபடி செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம் #Chennai #SupremeCourt #DinakaranNews [7/10, 15:04] sekarreporter1: . [7/10, 15:19] sekarreporter1: The Writ Petition filed by one KK Ramesh Advocate before Supreme Court challenging construction of Pen Memorial for late kalaignar came up for hearing before the bench comprising of Hon’bleChief Justice of India and Hon’ble Mr Justice PS Narasimha The bench after hearing arguments Jaya Sukin for petitioner and of P. Wilson senior advocate appearing for Tamilandu Government dismissed the writ petition as devoid of merits. The writ petitioner in his petition wanted the court to restrain construction in all coastal states especially pen memorial due to raising sea level and in his grounds of writ petition sought to exhume the mortal remains of Anna, MGR , Jayalalithaa and Kalaignar laid to rest at Marina and wanted to be shifted to other places and to restrain the TN Government using of Marina for future burials. The Hon’ble CJI bench declined to entertain the writ petitions and dismissed the same.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 10, 2023