sekarreporter1: Mhc adv vinoth pandian 10 law tips [12/27, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )

[12/27, 11:03] sekarreporter1: Mhc adv vinoth pandian 10 law tips 🌹💐
[12/27, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )
[12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 333 : kamal kumar bhatu vs authorised officer allahabad bank : With regard to property to be sold under SARFASI act under auction , deposit of 10% as earnest money enabling a person to participate in bid process is not an amount towards sale price
[12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 721 : veena textiles ltd & another vs authorised officer IFCI ltd : writ petition against order made under section 14(3) of SARFASI act by magistrate held maintainable
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2000 (4) SCC 262 : Government of AP vs satyanarayana rao : A case cannot be referred to a larger bench on mere asking of a party
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2016 (7) MLJ 419 : kedar nath yadav vs state of west bengal : determination of proper compensation pertaining to land acquisition cannot be considered in writ jurisdiction
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) MLJ 489 : U manjunath rao vs U chandrasekar & another : A judge has to constantly remind himself that absence of reason in process of adjudication makes ultimate decision pregnable (sec 96 CPC 1908 ” reason is life of law ” )
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2011 (9) SCC 182 : state of punjab vs CBI : section 173 (8) of CRPC cannot limit or affect the inherent powers of high court to pass an order under section 482 of CRPC for fresh investigation or re investigation to prevent the abuse of any process of the court
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2013 (7) SCC 685 : commissioner of police new delhi vs mehar singh : Art 14 of the constitution of india does not envisage negative equality , any illegality once committed cannot be allowed to be perpetuated
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 691 : Punjab national bank vs consumer disputes redressal forum & others : section 34 of the SARFASI act expressly barred jurisdiction of not only civil courts but also of other authorities which would include consumer forum from granting injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken under SARFASI act
[12/27, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 801v: sterlite technologies ltd vs union of india : Elements of a prima facie case and question.of financial hardship required to be considered by debt recovery appellate tribunal while considering application for waiver