You may also like...
-
division bench comprising Justices K Kalyanasundaram and B Pugalendhi made the suggestion while quashing a detention order passed under the Act against an alleged drug offender, Machakalai, owing to 25 days delay in disposal of his representation by the authorities concerned. The judges noted that there is an inordinate delay in considering the representation of the detainee and in fact, in many such cases, this delay is artificially created by authorities to favour the detainees. “With the advancement in technology several modes of communication are available such as e-mail, fax, WhatsApp., etc, which can be used. A dedicated web-portal has to be established so that every movement of the representation could be monitored and any delay in considering the representation could be avoided,” they added and expressed hope that the government would take necessary action in this regard.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 8, 2021
-
MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD).No.6354 of 2010 and. 14.This Court is of the considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the writ petitioner cannot be construed as disproportionate with reference to the charges established against the writ petitioner and the speaking orders passed by the respondents.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 16, 2020
-
Today DMK has filed Review Petition against the judgment rendered in EWS case. Out of 5 judge bench of SupremeCourt by a majority opinion of 3 judges ,the constitutional Amendment granting 10% reservations to EWS was upheld on 7.11.2022. The DMK President and Chief Minister of Tamilnadu Mr MK Stalin convened all party meeting and took decision to file review petition before SupremeCourt against EWS judgment. Consequently today DMK has filed the review petition settled by P. Wilson Senior Advocate before Hon’ble SupremeCourt.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 5, 2022