The Madurai High Court on Friday made some strong remarks on the May 2018 police firing in Tuticorin and asked: “Can we kill people and throw money at them and say our job is over. Is that the society that we want to build?”

NewsIndia’Can we kill people, throw money at them and say our job is over’: Madras HC on Tuticorin firing
‘Can we kill people, throw money at them and say our job is over’: Madras HC on Tuticorin firing
The Madurai High Court on Friday made some strong remarks on the May 2018 police firing in Tuticorin and asked: “Can we kill people and throw money at them and say our job is over. Is that the society that we want to build?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India
Madurai/Chennai
June 26, 2021UPDATED: June 26, 2021 11:03 IST
“Can we kill people and throw money at
Madras High Court on 2018 police firing in Tuticorin. (Photo Credit- PTI)
The Madras High Court on Friday made some strong remarks over the May 2018 police firing in Tuticorin, where 13 persons were killed during a violent anti-Sterlite agitation, asking “can we kill people and throw money at them and say our job is over. Is that the society that we want to build?”

These were among the questions raised by Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee, now sitting at the Madurai bench, when the PIL petition from Henri Tiphagne, an activist, on the matter, came up for hearing today.
The bench, whose other member being Justice T S Sivagnanam, directed the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to forward a copy of its ‘undisclosed’ investigation report into the police firing.
“Is it possible to hush up the matter by just throwing money at the affected people,” the CJ asked, apparently referring to the ex-gratia announced to the kin of victims killed in the violent protest seeking closure of the Vedanta copper smelter plant over pollution concerns.
“It is somewhat alarming that the state through its police fires at unarmed protestors and no one is booked even after three years. It may not augur well for a civil society governed by the constitutional principles that we have to merely throw money at the families of the victims and give closure to an incident of possible brutality and excessive police action,” Chief Justice Banerjee added.
ADVERTISEMENT
He, however, said no conclusion needs to be drawn yet before the facts come to light. But it is necessary the facts come to light and be made public, he said.
CHECK THESE OUT
MORE

Punjab election: Parties go all out to woo Dalits as protesting farmers keep netas at bay
Punjab election: Parties go all out to woo Dalits as protesting farmers keep netas at bay
TRENDING
Calcutta HC snubs Mamata govt, rejects plea to recall NHRC probe into post-poll violence
Calcutta HC snubs Mamata govt, rejects plea to recall NHRC probe into post-poll violence
RECOMMENDED
What is next for students if not board exams?
What is next for students if not board exams?
MOST READ
Ex-WB CS Alapan Bandyopadhyay may lose retirement perks as Centre begins ‘major penalty’ proceedings
Ex-WB CS Alapan Bandyopadhyay may lose retirement perks as Centre begins ‘major penalty’ proceedings
RECOMMENDED
Interesting facts about 29 Indian states and 7 Union Territories with their capitals
Interesting facts about 29 Indian states and 7 Union Territories with their capitals
TRENDING
HC urged to direct Bengal govt to file report on withdrawing Suvendu security cover
HC urged to direct Bengal govt to file report on withdrawing Suvendu security cover
RECOMMENDED
The bench was passing interim orders on the PIL from Tiphagne, the executive director of People’s Watch, an NGO, praying for directions to the state to reopen the case registered by the NHRC on the incident.
Appearing in person, Tiphagne, also an advocate, told the bench that while the NHRC had closed the case in October 2018, it was yet to disclose the report filed by its team which had conducted an investigation at the site.
The grounds for closing the case, taken up on its own, in its order was ill-advised and the case must be reopened, he said.
Also Read: As private hospitals charge lakhs for PPE kits, masks, Covid patients take loans to pay huge bills
After considering the “adequate compensation” paid by the state to the victims, other appropriate steps taken to restore peace and normalcy by the government and the appointment of the judicial commission to look into police excesses, if any, the NHRC in its order passed in October 2018 held that “no further intervention in the matter is required”.
ADVERTISEMENT
The bench directed the NHRC to file its 2018 spot investigation report on the matter and clarify its stand on the issue through a counter affidavit in four weeks.
Also Read: Corona test result in 30 minutes: ICMR approves new test
The matter was transferred to the principal seat in Chennai and it will be taken up for further hearing on August 9.
Earlier, Advocate-General R Shunmugasundaram told the bench that the Judicial Commission of Inquiry headed by former High Court Judge Aruna Jagadeesan had submitted its interim report to the government on May 14 this year.
Anti-Sterlite protests in Tuticorin in southern Tamil Nadu against Sterlite peaked on May 22, 2018, leading to violence that resulted in 13 deaths in police firing.