Follow:
- Next story s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- Previous story In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)
More
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)