today 4 law tips 14:11] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 532 : Gajoo vs state of uttarakhand : A witness may be called interested only when he or she derives some benefit from result of litigation

[22/04, 14:11] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 532 : Gajoo vs state of uttarakhand : A witness may be called interested only when he or she derives some benefit from result of litigation
[22/04, 14:11] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 627 : Jks infra structure pvt ltd vs Edelweiss asset reconstruction co ltd : once notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act is issued , said notice constitutes attachment of secured assets
[22/04, 14:11] Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) SCC 213 : state of maharashtra vs mohd sajid hussain mohd s hussain : once a criminal case is set in motion by lodging an information in regard to commission of offence in terms of sec 154 CRPC , it may not be held to be imperative that all accused persons must be named in FIR
[22/04, 14:11] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 135 SC : Ajit sinh Arjunsinh gohil vs bar council of gujarat : complaint made by a litigant has to follow a definite procedure , required to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of one year ( sec 36 B Advocates act 1961 )