Follow:
- Next story [12/27, 10:12] Mohamad Rafic Eb: Cases hearing/submissions on either that may go on beyond 15 minutes per hearing must be posted to the evening Court beyond 4.15 p.m where especially the cases argued by delhi based senior legal luminaries appear as they normally charge day fee… Day is 24 hours. [12/27, 10:12] Mohamad Rafic Eb: 😁 [12/27, 10:13] Mohamad Rafic Eb: So that regular poor and needy litigant cases can be disposed expeditiously
- Previous story Ragavacahary: Very true as K Chandru says. What is the purpose in having a cause list that runs to around 600 pages a day and hardly a few are completed. Every judge should know his capacity as to the extent possible he could complete his board. None can finish 50 second appeals or 140 regular appeals or 150 writ Petitions. even the best of legal minds cannot finish more than 10 to 15 second appeals A day. Unfortunately once the matter is listed, I understand, it is not taken as pendency and if this is true one has to change the statistics. The easiest way to handle the situation is to revert to the old system of a monthly list followed by by weekly and the daily list shall contain only the admissions and miscellaneous applicationS and nothing more
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.11208, 11209, 11210, 11211, 11212 & 11213 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 WP.No.11208 of 2008 The Triplicane Permanent Fund Ltd., New No.162 (Old No.116) Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) represented by its Secretary, City Civil Court Building, Chennai – 600 104. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Chennai (East) Division, PAPJM Building, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Ice House Assessment Circle, 46, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028. .. Respondents
- sekarreporter1: ஆசிரியர்கள் நியமனத்தின் போது, அவர்களின் குற்றப் பின்னணியை ஏன் காவல்துறையினர் மூலம் விசாரிக்க கூடாது? என கேள்வி எழுப்பிய சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம், இது சம்பந்தமாக அரசு முடிவு எடுக்க வேண்டும் எனவும் அறிவுறுத்தியுள்ளது. [12/11, 17:36] sekarreporter1:Ag p s Raman and Aag nela kandan argued judges dkj pbbj
- [12/11, 17:02] sekarreporter1: வானம் இடிந்துவிடாது; முக்கிய வழக்கில் ‘குட்டு’ வைத்த ஐகோர்ட் https://www.dinamalar.com/news/tamil-nadu-news/case-against-tnusrb-chairman-sunil-court-condemns/3777379 [12/11, 17:02] sekarreporter1: .
- Justices M. Sundar and K. Rajasekar take the decision in light of the orders passed by the Supreme CourtThe Madras High Court on Tuesday (November 12, 2024) transferred to the Delhi High Court two writ petitions filed jointly by Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation and Sun TV Network Limited, challenging certain provisions of the Information Technology
- [12/11, 15:30] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxgBLBcz9zOsBsUM4SvBHQc65u3EtkwB_i?si=HVVNEfkKGXysMURM [12/11, 15:30] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [12/11, 15:29] sekarreporter1: Three aag with deputy cm udayanithy
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.11208, 11209, 11210, 11211, 11212 & 11213 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 WP.No.11208 of 2008 The Triplicane Permanent Fund Ltd., New No.162 (Old No.116) Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) represented by its Secretary, City Civil Court Building, Chennai – 600 104. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Chennai (East) Division, PAPJM Building, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Ice House Assessment Circle, 46, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028. .. Respondents
- sekarreporter1: ஆசிரியர்கள் நியமனத்தின் போது, அவர்களின் குற்றப் பின்னணியை ஏன் காவல்துறையினர் மூலம் விசாரிக்க கூடாது? என கேள்வி எழுப்பிய சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம், இது சம்பந்தமாக அரசு முடிவு எடுக்க வேண்டும் எனவும் அறிவுறுத்தியுள்ளது. [12/11, 17:36] sekarreporter1:Ag p s Raman and Aag nela kandan argued judges dkj pbbj
- [12/11, 17:02] sekarreporter1: வானம் இடிந்துவிடாது; முக்கிய வழக்கில் ‘குட்டு’ வைத்த ஐகோர்ட் https://www.dinamalar.com/news/tamil-nadu-news/case-against-tnusrb-chairman-sunil-court-condemns/3777379 [12/11, 17:02] sekarreporter1: .
- Justices M. Sundar and K. Rajasekar take the decision in light of the orders passed by the Supreme CourtThe Madras High Court on Tuesday (November 12, 2024) transferred to the Delhi High Court two writ petitions filed jointly by Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation and Sun TV Network Limited, challenging certain provisions of the Information Technology
- [12/11, 15:30] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxgBLBcz9zOsBsUM4SvBHQc65u3EtkwB_i?si=HVVNEfkKGXysMURM [12/11, 15:30] sekarreporter1: [12/11, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [12/11, 15:29] sekarreporter1: Three aag with deputy cm udayanithy