Vinothpandian: 1991 (4) SCC 279 : Nilofar insaf vs state of MP : A settled issue cannot be belatedly sought to be unsettled in a collateral attack on ground which does not go to the root of the matter [10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2005 (1) SCC 493 : K ganesh shet vs AK jayarama sheka : mercy cannot subvert any legal right upheld by lower court

[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1991 (4) SCC 279 : Nilofar insaf vs state of MP : A settled issue cannot be belatedly sought to be unsettled in a collateral attack on ground which does not go to the root of the matter
[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2005 (1) SCC 493 : K ganesh shet vs AK jayarama sheka : mercy cannot subvert any legal right upheld by lower court
[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1971 (2) SCC 58 : Harkishan singh vs state of punjab : where equities are equal , the one first in point of time shall prevail
[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 209 : KSFC vs pushpa fastners pvt ltd & others : Injunction / prohibitory relief claimed would always be in aid and assistance of main relief ( order XXX VIII rule 5 CPC 1908 )
[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: AIR 2010 SC 3540 : neeta rakesh jain vs Rakesh jeetmal jain : section 24 of the hindu marriage act provides a provision for grant of maintaineance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings
[10/25, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 335 SC : Ram kishun & others vs state of UP : surety does not have a right to dictate terms to the creditor as to how he should make recovery and pursue his remedies against principal debtor at his instance
[10/25, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2009 (4) SCC 366 : sipra bhattacharya vs dr Apaves bhattacharya : court is duty bound to dispose of pending application for enhancement of maintenance before suit for divorce is decided
[10/25, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2003 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 354 SC : Narendra nath khaware vs parasnath khaware : judgement of acquittal rendered by high court , state not filing any special leave petition or appeal , an appeal by special leave at the instance of complainant is maintainable
[10/25, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person