Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) CTC 564 : Gnana Arulmoni vs RS maharajan : Held conduct of plaintiff most important factor for grant of equitable relief of specific performance ( specific relief act 1963 section 16 ( c )

[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) CTC 564 : Gnana Arulmoni vs RS maharajan : Held conduct of plaintiff most important factor for grant of equitable relief of specific performance ( specific relief act 1963 section 16 ( c )
[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 263 : kaleur rahman vs P kannan : suit for bare injunction restraining the authorities from granting electricity connection falls within bar of section 145 of the electricity act 2003
[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CTC 761 : Manjula L vs state of tamil nadu : government servant convicted for offence under section 138 of NI act , employee filed appeal and settled dispute and appellate court compounded offences , cannot be regarded as offence involving moral turpitude , dismissal of employee from service liable to be set aside
[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 801 : sterlite technologies ltd vs union of india : Elements of a prima facie case and question of financial hardship required to be considered by appellate tribunal while deciding on waiver application ( sec 21 RDDBFI act 1993 )
[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 748 : S Anandan & others vs state bank of india : loan contracted for poultry purposes , bank cannot charge interest at compound rate from date of suit , since it is borrowed for agricultural industrial purpose only ( sec 34 RDDBFI act 1993 )
[7/25, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 442 : nissan motors corporate office vs S giri prasad : With regard to summoning of an accused in a criminal case , order must reflect about application of mind to facts of case and law applicable thereto , when magistrate did not record basis of taking cognizance and simply ordered to issue summons to accused , complaint held liable to be quashed