Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 ) [10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: AIR 1994 SC 845 : state of MP vs Ramesh kumar sharma

[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: AIR 1994 SC 845 : state of MP vs Ramesh kumar sharma : In a departmental action relating to compassionate appointment , the applicant has no right to any particular post of his choice on compassionate ground , he can only claim to be considered for that post
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) All India criminal LR ( DB ) 456 : Re : Ketabul SK : mere failure to disclose pendency of a bail application before a superior court is not a relevant ground for cancellation of bail ( sec 438 CRPC 1973 )
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 1975 (2) SCC 840 : New india insurance co ltd vs shanti misra : discretion given by sec 5 of limitation act should not be defined or crystallised so as to convert a discretionary matter into a rigid rule of law
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) RAJ 304 : Bablu ghosh vs Amrit fresh pvt ltd : Held an erroneous view of law on a debatable point or a wrong exposition of law or a wrong application of law or a failure to apply proper law cannot be considered a mistake or error apparent on face of record
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 1984 (4) SCC 66 : OP kathpalia vs lakhmir singh : If refusal to condone delay results in grave miscarriage of justice , it would be a ground to condone delay
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) crimes 294 : Achuthanandan vs R Balakrishna pillai : In a corruption case appellate court has full power to review , re appreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which if an acquittal order is founded , criminal procedure code put no restrictions , however appellate court must bear in mind that in cases of acquittal , there is double presumption in favour of the accused
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (4) CTC 269 : Executive director corporation bank vs PR shantharam : Hearsay evidence can be relied on in departmental proceedings if there is a corroborative material
[10/28, 16:37] Vinothpandian: 2007(1) crimes 228 : devender singh vs state of haryana : demand of monetary assistance for domestic purposes not demand of dowry