Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule

[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 468 : varun pahwa vs Renu chaudhary : Power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technical limitations ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) All India criminal LR SC 197 : munna kumar upadhyaya vs state of AP : If the accused gave incorrect or false answers during the course of his statement under section 313 CRPC , the court can draw an adverse inference against him
[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2021 (4) CTC 269 : Executive director corporation bank vs PR shantharam : Hearsay evidence can be relied on in departmental proceedings if there is a corroborative material
[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances
[10/11, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 38 SC : Alka chandewar vs shamshul ishrar khan SC : orders of arbitral tribunal are deemed to be orders of court for all purposes , such orders are enforceable under civil procedure code 1908 in same manner as orders of court