Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) CCC 183 SC : punjab state power corporation ltd vs punjab state electricity regulatory commission : interest of consumers to be balanced with recovery of cost of electricity in a reasonable manner ( electricity act 2003 sec 61 ( g) )[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) RCR ( criminal ) SC : RB Ramlingam vs RB bhuvaneswari : delay of 568 days in filing special leave petition condoned on the ground that review application against judgement of single judge remained pending in high court ( art 136 of the constitution of india )

[19/02, 15:22] sekarreporter1: [19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2003 (11) SCC 584 : Ashwani kumar singh vs UP public service commission : It is now a well settled principle of law that even wait – listed candidates have no legal right to be appointed
[19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 1996 (6) supreme 640 : Rameshwar dass gupta vs state of UP : CPC 1908 order 21 rule 1 : Executing court cannot step out and grant a decree for interest which was not part of decree for execution on ground of delay in payment or for unreasonable stand taken in execution
[19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) CTC 473 : jayalakshmi Ammal vs kalia perumal : substantial question of law not framed at time of admission of appeal , can be framed even at final hearing stage of second appeal ( section 100 CPC 1908 )
[19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2012(4) SCC 547 : state of orissa vs ujjal kumar burdhan : existence of an arbitration Agreement cannot take criminal acts out of jurisdiction of courts of law
[19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) CTC 512 : karthika VM vs the chief manager indian bank : held availing of loan not a matter of right without fulfilling legal obligations appended to it , conduct of parties relevant criteria for bank to disburse loan amount
[19/02, 14:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 214 : sumit kumar vs naresh kumar : non – understanding and ignorance of any law is no excuse
[23/02, 10:49] sekarreporter1: [23/02, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 452 : sasi ( D) through LRS vs Aravindakshan nair and others : Application for review in view of its limited scope under the civil procedure code has to be disposed of expeditiously
[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case
[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) CCC 183 SC : punjab state power corporation ltd vs punjab state electricity regulatory commission : interest of consumers to be balanced with recovery of cost of electricity in a reasonable manner ( electricity act 2003 sec 61 ( g) )
[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) RCR ( criminal ) SC : RB Ramlingam vs RB bhuvaneswari : delay of 568 days in filing special leave petition condoned on the ground that review application against judgement of single judge remained pending in high court ( art 136 of the constitution of india )
[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2013 (3) SCC 1 : state of gujarat vs RA mehta : Reasonable apprehension that there is a real likelihood of bias affecting decision of a judge/ authority reiterated is sufficient to invoke doctrine of bias