Vinothpandian law tips: 2019 (4) SCC 767 : Ripudaman singh vs balkrishna : cheque issued by purchaser of a property not honoured , disputes cannot be considered in petition under section 482 CRPC , such disputes to be considered only in regular trial

[1/11, 14:07] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC 767 : Ripudaman singh vs balkrishna : cheque issued by purchaser of a property not honoured , disputes cannot be considered in petition under section 482 CRPC , such disputes to be considered only in regular trial
[1/11, 14:07] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) scale 698 : Bir singh vs mukesh kumar : subsequent filling in of an unfilled signed cheque is not an alteration
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2007 (7) SCC 309 : MCD vs qimat rai gupta : court should not add or delete words in statute
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 815 : Ravichandran AR vs magnitude realtors : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : limitation aspect could be taken into consideration only if it is prima facie barred by limitation not under presumption and assumptions
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) LW 172 : motilal vs BK babu sahib : while considering an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC , court to look into averments stated in the plaint alone while passing orders to reject the plaint
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2006 (6) SCC 736 : indian oil corporation vs NEPC india ltd : Existence or availment of civil remedy in respect of disputes arising out of breach of contract does not bar remedy under criminal law
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2005 (3) crimes 87 : state of delhi vs navjot sandhu : A few bits here and a few bits there on which the prosecution relies cannot be held to be adequate for connecting the accused in the offence of criminal conspiracy
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2007 (4) RCR ( criminal ) 870 SC : B suresh yadav vs sharifa bee : liability of a person can be both civil and criminal at the same time , criminal proceedings are not a short cut of other remedies available in law
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) SCC 135 : Rajinder kumar & others vs shri kuldeep singh : order 8 rule 10 CPC 1908 : held exparte decree is a valid decree for all purposes
[1/12, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2007 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 166 ( FB ) : P damodran vs cherkalam Abdulla : With regard to contempt proceedings initiated by supreme court or high court under articles 215 & 129 of constitution , limitation of one year prescribed under section 20 of contempt of courts act is applicable