You may also like...
-
Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) CCC 183 SC : punjab state power corporation ltd vs punjab state electricity regulatory commission : interest of consumers to be balanced with recovery of cost of electricity in a reasonable manner ( electricity act 2003 sec 61 ( g) )[23/02, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) RCR ( criminal ) SC : RB Ramlingam vs RB bhuvaneswari : delay of 568 days in filing special leave petition condoned on the ground that review application against judgement of single judge remained pending in high court ( art 136 of the constitution of india )
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2024
-
Sv jayaraman ஆழ்ந்த சிவில் சட்ட அறிவு, மாமனிதன் Kalaimani mhaa advocate வாழ்த்துரை
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 11, 2020
-
Bjp advts function rc paulkanakaraj க்கு பாராட்டு.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 18, 2021