![[7/29, 11:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1288360122142490624?s=08 [7/29, 11:56] Sekarreporter 1: [7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: Full bench judgement today on applicability of ESI act to educational institutions [7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: ESI Act notification application to educational institutions upheld by Full Bench [7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: ESI Act notification application to educational institutions upheld by Full Bench [7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: For esi senior advt s Ravinthiren argued](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVANMR .JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ/For Appellants : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr.A.P.Srinivas
- Previous story சத்தியமங்கலம் புலிகள் சரணாலயத்திற்குள் அமைந்துள்ள ஆதிகருவண்ணராயர், பொம்மாதேவி கோவில் மாசி பவுர்ணமி திருவிழாவின்போது, அரசு வகுத்துள்ள விதிமுறைகளை முழுமையாக அமல்படுத்த வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
Recent Posts
- Neet exam / THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANW.P.(MD)No.9920 of 2024Ms.MonishaVs.
- Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.
- Cmda 2nd master plan order setaside அதிரடி உத்தரவு நீதிபதிகள் எஸ்.எஸ்.சுந்தர் மற்றும் என்.செந்தில்குமார் அடங்கிய அமர்வு, மிகப்பெரிய நிலப்பரப்பை நீர்பிடிப்பு பகுதி என அறிவித்தது அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு எதிரானது என உத்தரவிட்டது.
- 02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.
More
Recent Posts
- Neet exam / THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANW.P.(MD)No.9920 of 2024Ms.MonishaVs.
- Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.
- Cmda 2nd master plan order setaside அதிரடி உத்தரவு நீதிபதிகள் எஸ்.எஸ்.சுந்தர் மற்றும் என்.செந்தில்குமார் அடங்கிய அமர்வு, மிகப்பெரிய நிலப்பரப்பை நீர்பிடிப்பு பகுதி என அறிவித்தது அரசியல் சட்டத்துக்கு எதிரானது என உத்தரவிட்டது.
- 02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.