You may also like...
-
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.22307 of 2013 Gnanaloussany Valmy …Petitioner Vs. The Registrar of Marriages District Registrar, Mylapore – Chennai-28. Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondent : Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocatefull order
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 14, 2022
-
sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1672466559397396481?t=45DbT-GWleETlSMr9apUsw&s=08 [6/24, 10:18] sekarreporter1: [6/24, 10:17] Advocate Anusha: 28 years legal battle finally concluded in SA no 59 of 2016 & cross objection no 26 of 2017 by justice Krishnan Ramasamy [6/24, 10:17] sekarreporter1: super In the result, the Second Appeal and the Cross Objection are partly allowed and accordingly, the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2015 in A.S.No.1 of 2007 passed by the first appellate Court, is modified to the extent stated above. The parties shall bear their own costs throughout. 21.06.2023 rst/suk Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To 1. Sub Court, Chidambaram, 2. II Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. rst/suk S.A.No.59 of 2016 and Cross Objection No.26 of 2017 21.06.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 24, 2023