வீட்டு அம்மா தீர்ப்பு அருமை முன்னாள் நீதிபதி present judgeக்கு பாராட்டுhome maker case

[6/23, 07:03] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1671928665565958144?t=Yuxw-qCmScmK_AwDVxAWcQ&s=08
[6/23, 07:03] sekarreporter1: [6/22, 21:25] Judge Suthantheram: I read the judgment rendered by Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy on21.6.2023 in S. A. 59 of2016 Kannian Naidu vs. Kamsala & others.
Though the view expressed by the Hon’ble Judge in favour of woman – Home maker is admirable and appreciable I have my own doubt whether it can be applied in the absence of any law or statute to pass a decree.
The Hon’ble Judge himself says in para 42 of the judgment that “To recognize the contribution made by the wife either directly or indirectly so far no legislation has been enacted. However in the present case the court can very well recognize the contribution made by wife towards purchase of properties by her husband,,,,….. looking after the home and taking care of the family.
In this case the properties were purchased in the name of wife from the money earned by husband and it is held wife is entitled for equal share.
The question arises if the property had been purchased in the name of husband himself, whether wife can claim equal share on the above principle?
On a separation of husband and wife whether homemaker can claim only maintenance or equal share on the property based on this judgment
( Sudanthiram )
[6/22, 22:33] sekarreporter1: 💐💐