[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) BC 158 ( DB ) : Kumar Rohit vs Allahabad bank : Auction sale which proceeded on misrepresentation to intending bidders is definitely illegal and liable to be quashed[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2016(1) CTC 493 : Asianet communications p Ltd vs surya TV : no party can transfer any title better than what itself possesses , in a suit for injunction party bound to prove its own title in order to seek injunction[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 7 : Gopuram enterprises ltd vs integrated finance company : Held , post – award petition for interim measures maintainable only until award becomes enforceable ( sec 9 of the arbitration and coincilation act 1996 )[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) CCC 394 : Hari prasad Dwivedi and others vs S Raj lingam collector sultanpur and others : Authorities considering and rejecting case of petitioners cannot be held to be wilful disobedience of order of the writ court , legality or otherwise of such orders of the authorities may constitute a fresh cause of action for fresh writ petition cannot be gone into in contempt jurisdiction[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2005 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 457 ; Ashok Arora vs OP sharma : In contempt proceedings failure to obtain the consent of advocate general is a circumstance which high court can take into consideration while examining the matter on merits[01/02, 08:43] Vinothpandian: 2005 (1) RCR ( criminal ) 607 : public prosecutor , high court of Ap vs jangili sammaiah alias babu : law reports , short notes , digestive notes have no narration of facts , placing reliance on such law reports not desirable