09:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) CPR 36 : smt sujata vohra vs ISI escorts & others : consumer forum had held hospitals to be careful while issuing any document , correctness should be checked either by medical superintendent or by resident medical officer[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2000(1)

[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) CPR 36 : smt sujata vohra vs ISI escorts & others : consumer forum had held hospitals to be careful while issuing any document , correctness should be checked either by medical superintendent or by resident medical officer
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2000(1) RCR ( criminal ) 690 : state vs Ravi @ munna : In a criminal trial accused not represented by any counsel , appointment of counsel at state expense is not an idle formality , it is a right enshrined under art 21 of constitution of india
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CTC 720 : Vijayakumar M vs The inspector general of registration : Regarding societies registration act , held district registrar is not empowered to adjudicate upon rival claims , in this case district registrar conducted enquiry and adjudicated dispute relating to affairs of society , purpose of enquiry under the societies registration act is only to maintain correct records ( Tamil nadu societies registration act 1975 section 36 )
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2012 CRI LJ 1092 : K neelamegam vs durgamoorth revenue divisional officer , sivagangai : Act constituting contempt must be an action prohibited by law , held too dangerous to punish a person without making a particular action prohibited by law
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 510 : Notified area council vs Titilagarh club : order 8 rule 9 CPC prohibits any pleadings subsequent to written statement of a defendant being filed other than by way of defence to a set off or counterclaim except by leave of court and upon such terms as court thinks fit
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2010 (2) SCC 654 : Athar hussain vs syed siraj ahmed : In a matrimonial proceedings preference of child aged about 10 to 11 years old not to be overlooked while deciding interim custody of children
[13/02, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CCC 135 SC : Ajit sinh Arjunsinh gohil vs bar council of gujarat : complaint made by a litigant has to follow a definite procedure , required to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of one year ( sec 36 B Advocates act 1961 )