28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it

[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case
[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2021 (4) CTC 44 : somasundram vs parameswariammal : Pertaining to a title of a property revenue records not documents of title and cannot confer title unless supported by valid title documents ( section 115 evidence act 1872 )
[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) CTC 546 : UCAL machine tools ltd chennai vs special deputy collector ( stamps ) district collector office chennai : Held order passed but not communicated to aggrieved party cannot be put against such party , unless and until order is communicated in manner known to and acceptable in accordance with law it cannot have any force for implementation
[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 706 : Mrudul M damle vs CBI : In a proceedings relating to transfer of a criminal case , safety convenience of parties including witnesses to be produced at trial are the relevant considerations ( sec 406 CRPC 1973 )
[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 257 : Kailash chandra sharma vs ICICI bank ltd and others : Notice under section 13 (2) of the SARFASI act to be issued by secured creditor need to be valid and effective in law , if such a notice is issued by a counsel representing bank / secured creditor / authorised officer under section 13 (2) on instruction founded on a conscious decision approving such a step , same cannot be repudiated to be in contravention of letter and spirit of provisions of acts and rules