30.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* Even though the Directive Principles *per se* cannot be enforced by the Court nor can the Court can compel the State to undertake legislation to implement a

[4/29, 21:52] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *30.04.’21, LAW NOTES:*

Even though the Directive Principles *per se* cannot be enforced by the Court nor can the Court can compel the State to undertake legislation to implement a Directive, the Honourable Supreme Court has been giving directions to the Government to remove the grievances which have been caused by non-implementation of the Directives.

*i) To issue a notification under the minimum wages Act, for the benefit of bonded and other exploited* *labourers.*

*1)* [(1985) 3 SCC 162]
Mukesh Advani Vs State of Madhya Pradesh.

*ii) To set up a joint committee of the Union and a State Government as a Machinery to ensure that the poor and* *needy employees are not exploited.*

*1)* [(1984) 3 SCC 161]
Bandhna Mukti Morcha Vs Union of India.

*iii) To take various steps for extending the benefit of Article 39A to all undertrial prisoners.*

*1)* [(2005) 8 SCC 534]
Sheela Borse Vs State of Maharastra.

*iv) To lay down procedural safeguards in the matter of adoption of Indian Children by foreigners in view of* *Article 39(f).*

*1)* [(1987) 1 SCC 66]
Laxmi Kant Pandey Vs Union of India.

*(To be continued)*
[4/29, 21:57] Sekarreporter1: .