5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 305 : Polyhose india pvt ltd vs inspector general of registration : With regard to sale certificate issued to auction purchaser under SARFASI act , held auction purchaser liable to pay 5% stamp duty under the stamp act , not required to pay stamp duty on guideline value

[8/28, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 305 : Polyhose india pvt ltd vs inspector general of registration : With regard to sale certificate issued to auction purchaser under SARFASI act , held auction purchaser liable to pay 5% stamp duty under the stamp act , not required to pay stamp duty on guideline value
[8/28, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) CCC 280 : mohandas panicker vs dakshayani : In a family court proceedings , when adultery on wife is proved , she is not entitled to get any amount as maintenance under section 125 (4) CRPC 1973
[8/28, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2012 (6) SCC 430 : A shanmugam vs Ariya kshatriya Rajakula vamsathu madalaya nandhavana : With regard to granting Ad interim injunction , held pleadings need to be critically examined by judicial officers or judges both before issuing ad interim injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[8/28, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2010 (13) SCC 657 : sunil kumar sambu dayal gupta vs state of maharastra : presumption of innocence is a human right , appellate court should not interfere with acquittal order passed by trial court merely because two views are possible in a given case

You may also like...