Follow:
- Next story Justice R. Mahadevan on Thursday directed the Income Tax department to file a detailed counter affidavit within two weeks to his writ petition challenging proceedings initiated under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act of 1988.Sasikala, his counsel M.R. Venkatesh asserted that the petitioner was personally not involved in any such transaction. He said there was nothing on record to involve his client in the issue. The Income Tax officials had neither produced any MoU with respect to Spectrum Mall nor proved that his client had deposited any cash in his bank accounts. No proceedings for capital gain had also been initiated so far, he told Justice Mahadevan before M. Sheela, Special Public Prosecutor for the Income Tax department, undertook to file a detailed counter affidavit.
- Previous story 6/25, 21:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1276181202530115584?s=08 [6/25, 21:21] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 21:16] Senior Advt S Prabagaran: “Bar Council is the Leader of the Bar” declares the Constitution Bench, Supreme Court. Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtra AIR 1971 SC 385 – (1970) 2 SCC 484
Recent Posts
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARW.P.No.11087 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.12165 & 12166 of 20241.S.R.Muthusamy2.M.RavichandranVs.1.The District Collector, Tiruppur District
- This appeal raises a very interesting question of law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANSecond Appeal No.714 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.5377 of 20241.Lakshmi Ammal2.Roji Ammal
- Today tips [05/05, 07:14] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: 1998 (7) SCC 123: –
More
Recent Posts
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARW.P.No.11087 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.12165 & 12166 of 20241.S.R.Muthusamy2.M.RavichandranVs.1.The District Collector, Tiruppur District
- This appeal raises a very interesting question of law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANSecond Appeal No.714 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.5377 of 20241.Lakshmi Ammal2.Roji Ammal
- Today tips [05/05, 07:14] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: 1998 (7) SCC 123: –