SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

CRL. M.P. NO. 13621 OF 2022 IN CRL. O.P. NO.12934 OF 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The present miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following three prayers :- direct all forms of Media (online/off-line/print media) to refrain from effecting any publication/disclosure of name, address, photographs, family details, neighbourhood or any other particulars, which may have an effect of leading the disclosure of the identity of the rape victims during pre or post trial of the case;

Uncategorized

CRL. M.P. NO. 13621 OF 2022 IN CRL. O.P. NO.12934 OF 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The present miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following three prayers :- direct all forms of Media (online/off-line/print media) to refrain from effecting any publication/disclosure of name, address, photographs, family details, neighbourhood or any other particulars, which may have an effect of leading the disclosure of the identity of the rape victims during pre or post trial of the case;

CRL. M.P. NO. 13621 OF 2022 IN CRL. O.P. NO.12934 OF 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The present miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following three prayers :- direct all forms of...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.Nos.12159, 18209 & 18213 of 2022 B.Shanmugam   ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.12159 of 2022 R.V.Ashok Kumar               ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.18209 of 2022 V.Senthil Balaji ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.18213 of 2022. Full order senthil balaji minister case.     For Petitioners                         ::           Mr.Sriram Panchu Senior Counsel for Mr.K.S.Arivazhagan in W.P.No.12159 of 2022 Mr.Aryama Sundaram Senior Counsel assisted by Fr.Xavier Arulraj Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Bharanikumar in W.P.No.18209 of 2022 Mr.Sidharth Luthra Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.S.Prabhakaran Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Bharanikumar in W.P.No.18213 of 2022 For Respondent :: Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr.S.Sasikumar Special Public Prosecutor for Enforcement Directorate COMMON  ORDER T.RAJA, J. AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.Nos.12159, 18209 & 18213 of 2022 B.Shanmugam   ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.12159 of 2022 R.V.Ashok Kumar               ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.18209 of 2022 V.Senthil Balaji ..  Petitioner in W.P.No.18213 of 2022. Full order senthil balaji minister case.     For Petitioners                         ::           Mr.Sriram Panchu Senior Counsel for Mr.K.S.Arivazhagan in W.P.No.12159 of 2022 Mr.Aryama Sundaram Senior Counsel assisted by Fr.Xavier Arulraj Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Bharanikumar in W.P.No.18209 of 2022 Mr.Sidharth Luthra Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.S.Prabhakaran Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Bharanikumar in W.P.No.18213 of 2022 For Respondent :: Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr.S.Sasikumar Special Public Prosecutor for Enforcement Directorate COMMON  ORDER T.RAJA, J. AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON            :  12.08.2022 DATE OF DECISION   :   01.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.Nos.12159, 18209 & 18213 of 2022...

26.The Government of Kerala sent its suggestion on the Amendment which was placed before the committee and the same was also accepted.  But even after a lapse of seven years, the Amendment is yet to see the light of the day.  We would only hope that the legislation is expedited and the concerns of the Revenue are suitably addressed at the earliest.    27.With the above observations we dismiss the writ appeals.  There shall be no order as to costs.  Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.          (M.N.B., CJ)          (N.M.,J.)

Uncategorized

26.The Government of Kerala sent its suggestion on the Amendment which was placed before the committee and the same was also accepted.  But even after a lapse of seven years, the Amendment is yet to see the light of the day.  We would only hope that the legislation is expedited and the concerns of the Revenue are suitably addressed at the earliest.    27.With the above observations we dismiss the writ appeals.  There shall be no order as to costs.  Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.          (M.N.B., CJ)          (N.M.,J.)

20.As stated in the earlier order, it is imperative that the teachers are sensitized on this issue and once they get a proper understanding as to what is undergone by a child who belongs...

20.As stated in the earlier order, it is imperative that the teachers are sensitized on this issue and once they get a proper understanding as to what is undergone by a child who belongs to this community, they will be in a better position to give proper guidance.  In view of the same, this Court expects the 17th and 18th respondents to take up this issue seriously and to  start the process of sensitizing teachers in the school.  The steps taken by the 17th and 18th respondents in this regard shall also be informed to this Court by way of filing a status report during the next date of hearing. 21.Post this writ petition for hearing on  09.12.2022 at 2.15 pm. 02.09.2022 Internet: Yes KP N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J KP WP No.7284 of  2021 02.09.2022

Uncategorized

20.As stated in the earlier order, it is imperative that the teachers are sensitized on this issue and once they get a proper understanding as to what is undergone by a child who belongs to this community, they will be in a better position to give proper guidance.  In view of the same, this Court expects the 17th and 18th respondents to take up this issue seriously and to  start the process of sensitizing teachers in the school.  The steps taken by the 17th and 18th respondents in this regard shall also be informed to this Court by way of filing a status report during the next date of hearing. 21.Post this writ petition for hearing on  09.12.2022 at 2.15 pm. 02.09.2022 Internet: Yes KP N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J KP WP No.7284 of  2021 02.09.2022

W.P.No.7284 of 2021 ANAND VENKATESH,. J. Pursuant to the earlier orders passed on 22.08.2022, the  matter was posted for hearing today to report the follow up action  on the directions issued by this Court...

THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 Order of CJ declaring in a WP of an election. For  Petitioners                     : Mr.V.Raghavachari                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.K.R.Laxman   For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Standing Counsel   for R-1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader, for RR-2 to 4 COMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 Order of CJ declaring in a WP of an election. For  Petitioners                     : Mr.V.Raghavachari                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.K.R.Laxman   For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel                            (in all W.P.(MD)s)    for Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Standing Counsel   for R-1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader, for RR-2 to 4 COMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).Nos.3131 of 3133 of 2022 S.V.S.P.Nagaraja .. Petitioner    ...

(n) if the appellant adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Special Court to remand the appellant to custody as laid down by the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shambhu Nath Singh (JT 2001 (4) SC 319); Before parting with, we make it clear that the observations and findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purpose of considering the application for bail and the Special Court shall not be influenced by the same during the trial or while rendering its decision.                (S.V.N.,J.)  (A.D.J.C.,J.)                   02.09.2022.

Uncategorized

(n) if the appellant adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Special Court to remand the appellant to custody as laid down by the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shambhu Nath Singh (JT 2001 (4) SC 319); Before parting with, we make it clear that the observations and findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purpose of considering the application for bail and the Special Court shall not be influenced by the same during the trial or while rendering its decision.                (S.V.N.,J.)  (A.D.J.C.,J.)                   02.09.2022.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Reserved on  : 16.8.2022   Delivered  on : 02.9.2022   CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA   Criminal Appeal...

Apro case affidavit in mhc

Uncategorized

Apro case affidavit in mhc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)   W.P.NO.                                         OF 2022 Srinivasa Masilamani, S/o. Masilamani, No.29/24, Durga Colony, Senthangudi, Mayiladuthurai – 609 001                                                                                                                   Petitioner  ...

Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought recruitment under purview of TNPSC. Mr P. Wilson submitted before the court that 2017 ad hoc rules framed under Art 309 for recruitment of APRO temporary posts does not require any specific UG degree .

Uncategorized

Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought recruitment under purview of TNPSC. Mr P. Wilson submitted before the court that 2017 ad hoc rules framed under Art 309 for recruitment of APRO temporary posts does not require any specific UG degree .

Recruitment of APRO’s by TN Govt under GO No 102 dated 1.8.2022 stayed by Hon’ble Justice Krishnakumar today after hearing arguments of P.Wilson Senior Advocate. The said GO amended qualifications of APRO and brought...