Follow:
- Next story The Madras High Court has refused to order payment of a disability pension to an Army driver who was invalidated out of service due to epilepsy. The court said there was no material to doubt the correctness of the medical board’s report that the disability was neither attributable to, nor aggravated by military service.
- Previous story The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.28124 of 2022 and W.M.P. Nos.27414 and 27417 of 2022 M/s.Engineering Aids Rep. by its Managing Partner V. Ramesh Babu … Petitioner vs 1. State Tax Officer (Circle),Jurisdiction :Avadi Zone – III, Chennai North : Tamil Nadu. 2. Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Avadi Assessment Circle, ICT Building, 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600 003. 3. The Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Plot No.6/PC3-4, TNHB 60 Feet Road, In view of the quashing of the impugned order, the consequential bank attachment notice issued to the 3rd respondent bank is also quashed
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு
More
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு