SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1470 of 2021 V.Prabhakar                                                  .. Appellant. For Appellant             : Mr.L.Chandra Kumar                                  For Respondent         : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1470 of 2021 V.Prabhakar                                                  .. Appellant. For Appellant             : Mr.L.Chandra Kumar                                  For Respondent         : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 06.09.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 16.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1470 of 2021...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27395 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.23598 of 2016 The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., For Petitioner     : Mr.C.Gauthama Raj           For R1 &  R3     : Mr.K.H.Ravi Kumar                                 Government Advocate                                                     For R2                    : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu   ORDER

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27395 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.23598 of 2016 The Management of Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., For Petitioner     : Mr.C.Gauthama Raj           For R1 &  R3     : Mr.K.H.Ravi Kumar                                 Government Advocate                                                     For R2                    : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu   ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED :  12.09.2022   CORAM :   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27395 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.23598 of 2016   The Management of Metropolitan...

Temple case In view of the submission made by learned Additional Advocate General to the effect that the respondents are not going to send back the temple elephants to Assam and that the respondents would take care of the temple elephants in the best possible manner, we do not find reason to give any further direction to the respondents to take care of the temple elephants. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.24062 of 2022 is closed. (M.D., ACJ.)           (S.M., J.). For the Petitioner       : Mr.M.R.Dhalapathy Vignesh Kumar For the Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader for 1st respondent and assisted by Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4 ORDER

Uncategorized

Temple case In view of the submission made by learned Additional Advocate General to the effect that the respondents are not going to send back the temple elephants to Assam and that the respondents would take care of the temple elephants in the best possible manner, we do not find reason to give any further direction to the respondents to take care of the temple elephants. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.24062 of 2022 is closed. (M.D., ACJ.)           (S.M., J.). For the Petitioner       : Mr.M.R.Dhalapathy Vignesh Kumar For the Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader for 1st respondent and assisted by Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4 ORDER

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  15.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.M.DURAISWAMY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.No.25120 of 2022 N.Sivaganesan                                       .. Petitioner Vs The...

Durai Arun: Senior Counsel Mr.Wilson Sir again proved that he is a warrior of Social Justice and he has been walking through the path which was laid down by Anna and Kalaingar , yes Wilson Sir argued classically once again before Supreme court in 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections case

Uncategorized

Durai Arun: Senior Counsel Mr.Wilson Sir again proved that he is a warrior of Social Justice and he has been walking through the path which was laid down by Anna and Kalaingar , yes Wilson Sir argued classically once again before Supreme court in 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections case

[9/16, 09:19] Durai Arun: Senior Counsel Mr.Wilson Sir again proved that he is a warrior of Social Justice and he has been walking through the path which was laid down by Anna and Kalaingar...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.26871 of 2021 Kandasami Pillai                      … Petitioner  vs. The Commissioner,     Hindu Religious and Charitable.

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.26871 of 2021 Kandasami Pillai                      … Petitioner  vs. The Commissioner,     Hindu Religious and Charitable.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved On 03.08.2022 Pronounced On  05.09.2022 CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.26871 of 2021 Kandasami Pillai                      … Petitioner vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and...

Madras high court sep 15 th order whatsapp news round up

Uncategorized

Madras high court sep 15 th order whatsapp news round up

 முதலமைச்சர் ஸ்டாலின் வீட்டை முற்றுகையிட்டதற்காக பதிவு செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கை ரத்து செய்யக் கோரி ஏ.பி.வி.பி. அமைப்பினர் தொடர்ந்த வழக்கை தள்ளுபடி செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. தஞ்சை மாவட்டத்தில் மாணவி லாவண்யாவின் மரணத்திற்கு நீதி கேட்டும், மேலும் மரணங்கள் நிகழக் கூடாது என்பதை வலியுறுத்தியும், தற்கொலை...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Therefore, eventhough I am in agreement in part with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the procedure adopted by Trial Court is incorrect, still this revision will not succeed and I find nothing in this complaint to refer the same to investigation to the respondent police.  Accordingly, this revision is dismissed. For Petitioner           : Mr.S.A.Sathia Chandran                                  For Respondents       : Mr.S.Vinothkumar   Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Therefore, eventhough I am in agreement in part with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the procedure adopted by Trial Court is incorrect, still this revision will not succeed and I find nothing in this complaint to refer the same to investigation to the respondent police.  Accordingly, this revision is dismissed. For Petitioner           : Mr.S.A.Sathia Chandran                                  For Respondents       : Mr.S.Vinothkumar   Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.1165 of 2022 Dr.R.Radhakrishnan         … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,     Kotturpuram Zone, Kotturpuram, Chennai....

Savuku sankar casen full.order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial). For Registry : Shri.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel      assisted by Shri.N.Mohideen Basha      Standing counsel for High Court For Respondent No.1       : Contemnor in-person For Respondent No.5       : Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri,             Assistant Solicitor General of India           for Madurai Bench ORDER. Madurai jail ,

Uncategorized

Savuku sankar casen full.order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial). For Registry : Shri.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel      assisted by Shri.N.Mohideen Basha      Standing counsel for High Court For Respondent No.1       : Contemnor in-person For Respondent No.5       : Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri,             Assistant Solicitor General of India           for Madurai Bench ORDER. Madurai jail ,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE  B.PUGALENDHI SUO MOTU CONT P(MD) No.1124 of 2022 The Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of...

stay granted tasmac shop opening HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No.   24893  of 2022   Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.                                                                                                                          …Petitioner

Uncategorized

stay granted tasmac shop opening HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No.   24893  of 2022   Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.                                                                                                                          …Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction)     W.P.No.   24893  of 2022     Rajasekar, S/o. Mr. Rajangam, Door No. 2/23, Keezha Street, Sooriyamanal Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.      ...