SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022. . For Petitioners                           :   Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz                                  For Respondent 1                            :   Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor                                  For

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022. . For Petitioners                           :   Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz                                  For Respondent 1                            :   Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor                                  For

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022. . For Petitioners                           :   Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz                                  For Respondent 1                            :   Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022. . For Petitioners                           :   Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz                                  For Respondent 1                            :   Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor                                  For Respondent 2                           :    No appearance – – – – – O R D E R Such view of the matter, even the entire allegation taken on its face value would not constitute any offence as against the petitioners. Therefore, the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.796 of 2022, pending on the file of the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai as against the petitioners herein namely A2 and A3 alone stand quashed. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022. . For Petitioners                           :   Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz                                  For Respondent 1                            :   Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor                                  For Respondent 2                           :    No appearance – – – – – O R D E R Such view of the matter, even the entire allegation taken on its face value would not constitute any offence as against the petitioners. Therefore, the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.796 of 2022, pending on the file of the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai as against the petitioners herein namely A2 and A3 alone stand quashed. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.07.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR   Crl.O.P.No.  11836   of   2022   and Crl.M.P.No.  6698   of  2022 Subburaj Maheswari .. Petitioners/A2 & A3 Vs. State...

Suo Motu CONT P(MD)No.1124 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. & B.PUGALENDHI, J. Thiru.Shankar @ Savukku Shankar, a suspended employee of the Government of Tamil Nadu in an interview to a YouTube Channel, namely, Red Pix on 22.07.2022 had made the following statement : “The entire higher judiciary is riddled with corruption” 2.Issue notice to Thiru.Shankar @ Savukku Shankar to show cause as to why proceedings for criminal contempt should not be initiated against him. (G.R.S, J.) & (B.P,J.) 04.08.2022 skm 1/2 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. & B.PUGALENDHI, J. skm Suo Motu CONT P(MD)No.1124 of 2022 04.08.2022

Uncategorized

Suo Motu CONT P(MD)No.1124 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. & B.PUGALENDHI, J. Thiru.Shankar @ Savukku Shankar, a suspended employee of the Government of Tamil Nadu in an interview to a YouTube Channel, namely, Red Pix on 22.07.2022 had made the following statement : “The entire higher judiciary is riddled with corruption” 2.Issue notice to Thiru.Shankar @ Savukku Shankar to show cause as to why proceedings for criminal contempt should not be initiated against him. (G.R.S, J.) & (B.P,J.) 04.08.2022 skm 1/2 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. & B.PUGALENDHI, J. skm Suo Motu CONT P(MD)No.1124 of 2022 04.08.2022

[pdf-embedder url=”https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/suo-motu-pdf-dt-04.08.22.pdf” title=”suo motu pdf dt 04.08.22″][8/4, 19:38] Sekarreporter1: Suo Motu CONT P(MD)No.1124 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. & B.PUGALENDHI, J. Thiru.Shankar @ Savukku Shankar, a suspended employee of the Government of Tamil Nadu in...

8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some other judge. Says, it’s a very cheap practice which scandalises the judiciary and undermines it’s authority @THChennai

Uncategorized

8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some other judge. Says, it’s a very cheap practice which scandalises the judiciary and undermines it’s authority @THChennai

[8/4, 15:27] Sekarreporter1: [8/4, 15:26] Sekarreporter1: Justice Krishnan Ramasamy of Madras HC comes down heavily on former TN CM O Panneerselvam for having made a representation before CJ to transfer his suit to some...

Uncategorized

https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1555111404977262592?t=mkHW0X9_l4Mkon51Pt7ZBg&s=08 [8/4, 14:11] Sekarreporter1: Madras High Court grants injunction restraining a blogger from broadcasting a video defaming the brand Thalappakatti. Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for Thalappakatti brand. The court held that on viewing the video, the said video prima facie appears to tarnish the reputation of the Trademark Thalappakatti and the same cannot be considered as fair comment. Thalappakatti has also sought damages for 25 Lakhs.

[8/4, 13:41] Sekarreporter1: O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and...

O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory.  He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.

Uncategorized

O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory.  He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.

I O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J In a suit for alleged trademark infringement, the plaintiff has presented four Original Applications. Learned counsel for the plaintiff asserts that...

Chief justice ordered in contempt case

Uncategorized

Chief justice ordered in contempt case

ஆக்கிரமிப்பை அகற்ற நீதிமன்றம் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்தாத கலசப்பாக்கம் தாலுகாவின் அப்போதைய பெண் தாசில்தாரை நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கில் குற்றவாளி என அறிவித்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பளித்துள்ளது. தண்டனை விவரங்களை அறிவிப்பதற்காக ஆகஸ்ட் 5ம் தேதி அவரை நேரில் ஆஜராகவும் தலைமை நீதிபதி அமர்வு உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s. Vishaal Natural Food Products (I). For Petitioners        : Mr.B.Satish Sundar         For Respondent      : Mr.R.Nalliyappan. [8/3, 18:12] Satis Sunder Mhc Advocate: Judgement of sathikumar kurup.j.quasing complaint under s.138 N.I act holding that security cheque given by the accused to complainant during course of business without a contract between them is not an enforceable debt within the meaning of s.138 of the said act.Proceeding of the lower court quashed. [8/3, 18:12] Sekarreporter1: Super

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order Reserved On:  08.04.2022 Order Delivered On:   .07.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.No.6694 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3703 & 3705 of 2019 M/s....