SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

However, as stated (supra) all the accused persons have committed very serious offence as against the society. Thereby, there is huge loss to the exchequer and also the benefits to the original farmers were denied. Thus, custodial interrogation of the petitioners are very much required in this case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 21. Accordingly, all the criminal original petitions are dismissed. 08.07.2022 ata G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. For police add pp damotharan argued

Uncategorized

However, as stated (supra) all the accused persons have committed very serious offence as against the society. Thereby, there is huge loss to the exchequer and also the benefits to the original farmers were denied. Thus, custodial interrogation of the petitioners are very much required in this case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 21. Accordingly, all the criminal original petitions are dismissed. 08.07.2022 ata G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. For police add pp damotharan argued

RESERVED ON : 04.07.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 08.07.2022 Crl.O.P.Nos.11421, 11311, 11295, 11750, 12492, 12488, 12667, 13029, 12567, 12570, 12572, 12578, 13731, 14781 & 12082 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos.2629 and 2632 of 2021 & CMP Nos.17167, 17169, 17185 and 17186 of 2021 W.A. No. 2629 of 2021 Kandathil M. Mammen 17, Boat Club Road Third Avenue, R.A. Puram Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 028 rep. by his power agent Mr. Jossy Joseph .. Appellant Versus 1. Income Tax Settlement Commission Additional Bench, Chennai Ministry of Finance

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos.2629 and 2632 of 2021 & CMP Nos.17167, 17169, 17185 and 17186 of 2021 W.A. No. 2629 of 2021 Kandathil M. Mammen 17, Boat Club Road Third Avenue, R.A. Puram Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 028 rep. by his power agent Mr. Jossy Joseph .. Appellant Versus 1. Income Tax Settlement Commission Additional Bench, Chennai Ministry of Finance

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos.2629 and 2632 of 2021...

சென்னை உயர்நீதி மன்றத்தில் நாள் : 30.06.2022 முன்ைினையில்: மாண்புமிகு நீதியரசர் ஆர்.மகாததவன் மற்றும் மாண்புமிகு திரு நீதிபதி தே.சத்யா நாராயண பிரசாத்

Uncategorized

சென்னை உயர்நீதி மன்றத்தில் நாள் : 30.06.2022 முன்ைினையில்: மாண்புமிகு நீதியரசர் ஆர்.மகாததவன் மற்றும் மாண்புமிகு திரு நீதிபதி தே.சத்யா நாராயண பிரசாத்

சென்னை மாண்பனம உயர்நீதி மன்றத்தில் நாள் : 30.06.2022 முன்ைினையில்: மாண்புமிகு நீதியரசர் ஆர்.மகாததவன் மற்றும் மாண்புமிகு திரு நீதிபதி தே.சத்யா நாராயண பிரசாத் Cont. Pet. No. 515 / 2018 எதிர் WP No. 22967/2015 W.P. No. 16984 / 2017 Su...

W.P.Nos.16784, 16330, 16349, 16352, 16790, 16793, 16785, 16336, 16345, 16464, 16479, 16351, 16342, 16471, 16339, 16334 & 16466 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Today, when the matter was taken up, Mr.A.Manikkannan, Secretary / Chief Engineer (P)/FAC, TANGEDCO appeared before this Court and filed an affidavit. 2. On a perusal of the said affidavit, it could be seen that in the year 2019, the Board has created a new post in the nomenclature of Gangman and proceedings have been issued on 02.03.2019 and 06.03.2019 to that effect.

Uncategorized

W.P.Nos.16784, 16330, 16349, 16352, 16790, 16793, 16785, 16336, 16345, 16464, 16479, 16351, 16342, 16471, 16339, 16334 & 16466 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Today, when the matter was taken up, Mr.A.Manikkannan, Secretary / Chief Engineer (P)/FAC, TANGEDCO appeared before this Court and filed an affidavit. 2. On a perusal of the said affidavit, it could be seen that in the year 2019, the Board has created a new post in the nomenclature of Gangman and proceedings have been issued on 02.03.2019 and 06.03.2019 to that effect.

W.P.Nos.16784, 16330, 16349, 16352, 16790, 16793, 16785, 16336, 16345, 16464, 16479, 16351, 16342, 16471, 16339, 16334 & 16466 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Today, when the matter was taken up, Mr.A.Manikkannan, Secretary / Chief Engineer...

Appeal against acquittal in 138NI Act conform by Hon’ble Highcourt. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.A.No.373 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.8084 of 2019 S.Gunasekaran … Appellant/ for rep adv kumarasamy argued

Uncategorized

Appeal against acquittal in 138NI Act conform by Hon’ble Highcourt. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.A.No.373 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.8084 of 2019 S.Gunasekaran … Appellant/ for rep adv kumarasamy argued

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :05.08.2021 PRONOUNCED ON: 15.12.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN CRL.A.No.373 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.8084 of 2019 S.Gunasekaran … Appellant/Respondent/ Complainant Vs. Santhi … Respondent/Appellant/...

HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.19342, 19343 and 19344 of 2013 and MP.No.1,1,1 of 2013 V.Krishnamurthy Proprietor: M/s.Meena Advertisers .In the result, all the Writ Petitions stand dismissed and the petitioner is directed to pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Rajagopalan (in All WPs) Senior Counsel for M/s.G.R.Associates For Respondents : Mr.U.Arun (in All WPs) Additional Advocate General Asst.by: Mr.R.Kumaravel Additional Government Pleader

Uncategorized

HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.19342, 19343 and 19344 of 2013 and MP.No.1,1,1 of 2013 V.Krishnamurthy Proprietor: M/s.Meena Advertisers .In the result, all the Writ Petitions stand dismissed and the petitioner is directed to pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Rajagopalan (in All WPs) Senior Counsel for M/s.G.R.Associates For Respondents : Mr.U.Arun (in All WPs) Additional Advocate General Asst.by: Mr.R.Kumaravel Additional Government Pleader

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ORDERS RESERVED ON : 29.06.2022 PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON : 04.07.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.19342, 19343 and 19344 of 2013 and MP.No.1,1,1 of 2013...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 29.06.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 06.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.394 of 2022 For Appellant : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Mohammed Rafi for RR-1 to 3 : Mr.V.Balasubramanian, R6 : Notice served for RR-4, 5, 7 and 8 JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 29.06.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 06.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.394 of 2022 For Appellant : Mr.A.Ramesh, Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Mohammed Rafi for RR-1 to 3 : Mr.V.Balasubramanian, R6 : Notice served for RR-4, 5, 7 and 8 JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 29.06.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 06.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.394 of 2022 S.Srinivasan .. Appellant Versus 1. M/s....

அரசு உதவிபெறும் தனியார் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணிபுரிந்து, ராஜினாமா செய்து பணியிலிருந்து விலகிய பின், அரசுப் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணி நியமனம் பெற்ற ஆசிரியரின், முந்தைய பணிக்காலத்தை பணிப்பயன்களுக்காக கணக்கில் எடுத்துக்கொள்ள முடியாது.* *மாண்புமிகு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் தீர்ப்பு.*

Uncategorized

அரசு உதவிபெறும் தனியார் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணிபுரிந்து, ராஜினாமா செய்து பணியிலிருந்து விலகிய பின், அரசுப் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணி நியமனம் பெற்ற ஆசிரியரின், முந்தைய பணிக்காலத்தை பணிப்பயன்களுக்காக கணக்கில் எடுத்துக்கொள்ள முடியாது.* *மாண்புமிகு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் தீர்ப்பு.*

[7/8, 12:54] Sekarreporter: *அரசு உதவிபெறும் தனியார் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணிபுரிந்து, ராஜினாமா செய்து பணியிலிருந்து விலகிய பின், அரசுப் பள்ளியில் ஆசிரியராக பணி நியமனம் பெற்ற ஆசிரியரின், முந்தைய பணிக்காலத்தை பணிப்பயன்களுக்காக கணக்கில் எடுத்துக்கொள்ள முடியாது.* *மாண்புமிகு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் தீர்ப்பு.*...

Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal order with observations that there is no income proof produced by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra for alleged period as he rendered 65 Lakh to Mr.kasturiraja.

Uncategorized

Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal order with observations that there is no income proof produced by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra for alleged period as he rendered 65 Lakh to Mr.kasturiraja.

[7/8, 06:57] Sekarreporter: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/07/08/appeal-against-kasthuriraja-dismissed-for-kasthuriraja-counsel-haja-mohitheen-gisthy-https-t-co-s9a4aslvkg/ [7/8, 06:57] Sekarreporter: Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal...