SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: “single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy sets aside the impugned order dated 31.12.2023, with the respondent given the liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.”https://www.taxscan.in/scn-and-gst-demand-order-issued-on-same-date-madras-hc-sets-aside-order-directs-to-initiate-proceedings-in-accordance-with-law-read-order/396973/#:~:text=single%20bench%20of%20Justice%20Senthilkumar%20Ramamoorthy%20sets%20aside%20the%20impugned%20order%20dated%2031.12.2023%2C%20with%20the%20respondent%20given%20the%20liberty%20to%20initiate%20proceedings%20in%20accordance%20with%20the%20law.[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: 👍

Uncategorized

[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: “single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy sets aside the impugned order dated 31.12.2023, with the respondent given the liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.”https://www.taxscan.in/scn-and-gst-demand-order-issued-on-same-date-madras-hc-sets-aside-order-directs-to-initiate-proceedings-in-accordance-with-law-read-order/396973/#:~:text=single%20bench%20of%20Justice%20Senthilkumar%20Ramamoorthy%20sets%20aside%20the%20impugned%20order%20dated%2031.12.2023%2C%20with%20the%20respondent%20given%20the%20liberty%20to%20initiate%20proceedings%20in%20accordance%20with%20the%20law.[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: 👍

[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: “single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy sets aside the impugned order dated 31.12.2023, with the respondent given the liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with the law.”https://www.taxscan.in/scn-and-gst-demand-order-issued-on-same-date-madras-hc-sets-aside-order-directs-to-initiate-proceedings-in-accordance-with-law-read-order/396973/#:~:text=single%20bench%20of%20Justice%20Senthilkumar%20Ramamoorthy%20sets%20aside%20the%20impugned%20order%20dated%2031.12.2023%2C%20with%20the%20respondent%20given%20the%20liberty%20to%20initiate%20proceedings%20in%20accordance%20with%20the%20law.[09/05, 16:27] sekarreporter1: 👍

Land mark judgement on compensation under MV act foreign employed /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJICMA(MD) No.249 of 2021 andCMP(MD) No.2123 of 2021The Branch ManagerThe Oriental Insurance Company LimitedOld No.145, New No.211 Sekkalai Road, 1st Floor,Sathiyamoorthi Illam,Karaikudi – 630 001. … AppellantVs.1.Mrs.Ramzan Begam2.Minor Abdul Rahman3.Minor Abu Thalha(Minor respondents 2 & 3 represented by their mother/guardian the 1st respondent)4.N.Murugesan.

Uncategorized

Land mark judgement on compensation under MV act foreign employed /THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJICMA(MD) No.249 of 2021 andCMP(MD) No.2123 of 2021The Branch ManagerThe Oriental Insurance Company LimitedOld No.145, New No.211 Sekkalai Road, 1st Floor,Sathiyamoorthi Illam,Karaikudi – 630 001. … AppellantVs.1.Mrs.Ramzan Begam2.Minor Abdul Rahman3.Minor Abu Thalha(Minor respondents 2 & 3 represented by their mother/guardian the 1st respondent)4.N.Murugesan.

[09/05, 15:58] sekarreporter1: [09/05, 15:57] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1788516100558528658?t=rvlLiQxVq5QeBRhTrVctQQ&s=08[09/05, 15:57] sekarreporter1: Landmark judgement on compensation under MV Act. Foreign employed. Accident in india .[09/05, 15:58] sekarreporter1: 👍 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTReserved on:18.10.2023...

Historical order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJICMA(MD) No.276 of 2020 andCMP(MD) No.3729 of 2020Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

Uncategorized

Historical order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJICMA(MD) No.276 of 2020 andCMP(MD) No.3729 of 2020Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTReserved on:18.12.2023 : Pronounced on:29.04.2024 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJICMA(MD) No.276 of 2020 andCMP(MD) No.3729 of 2020Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Madurai Division V)...

[09/05, 13:38] sekarreporter1: Justice K Kumaresh Babu of #MadrasHighCourt grants a week’s time to police to file a counter to anticipatory bail plea by G Felix Gerald of RedPix in a case booked under TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act following the interview he had taken with Savukku Shankar @THChennai[09/05, 13:39] sekarreporter1: Judge says YouTube channels have become a nuisance and it is high time the govt starts controlling their activities. He says the interviewers must be arrayed as A1 in such cases because it is they who prompt interviewees to make derogatory & objectionable statements.

Uncategorized

[09/05, 13:38] sekarreporter1: Justice K Kumaresh Babu of #MadrasHighCourt grants a week’s time to police to file a counter to anticipatory bail plea by G Felix Gerald of RedPix in a case booked under TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act following the interview he had taken with Savukku Shankar @THChennai[09/05, 13:39] sekarreporter1: Judge says YouTube channels have become a nuisance and it is high time the govt starts controlling their activities. He says the interviewers must be arrayed as A1 in such cases because it is they who prompt interviewees to make derogatory & objectionable statements.

[09/05, 13:38] sekarreporter1: Justice K Kumaresh Babu of #MadrasHighCourt grants a week’s time to police to file a counter to anticipatory bail plea by G Felix Gerald of RedPix in a case booked under...

Today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable to either or survivor[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court

Uncategorized

Today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable to either or survivor[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court

Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable...

Justice AD Jagadish Chandira says, there’s a doubt whether the injuries were sustained during the road accident or inside Coimbatore prison. Now that inquiry had been conducted by DLSA, the HCP can be closed by directing officials to consider his mother’s representation.[09/05, 11:27] sekarreporter1: JUDGES CLOSE THE HCP with a direction to consider a representation made by Savukku Shankar’s mother for change of prison

Uncategorized

Justice AD Jagadish Chandira says, there’s a doubt whether the injuries were sustained during the road accident or inside Coimbatore prison. Now that inquiry had been conducted by DLSA, the HCP can be closed by directing officials to consider his mother’s representation.[09/05, 11:27] sekarreporter1: JUDGES CLOSE THE HCP with a direction to consider a representation made by Savukku Shankar’s mother for change of prison

[09/05, 11:27] sekarreporter1: Justice AD Jagadish Chandira says, there’s a doubt whether the injuries were sustained during the road accident or inside Coimbatore prison. Now that inquiry had been conducted by DLSA, the HCP...

AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONERI, K.Selvaperunthagai, S/o.Kuppuswamy, Indian, aged about 64 Years, President of Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (Indian National Congress), Sathyamurthy Bhavan, 40, Thiru Vi Ka Salai, Chennai 600 002, residing at B15, Tower Block, TNHB Officer Quarters, Taylor Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600010 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: counsel on record Advocates suriya prakasam , chandramohan, victor,damodaran, D selvam , navash , venkadesh, sasikumar,

Uncategorized

AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONERI, K.Selvaperunthagai, S/o.Kuppuswamy, Indian, aged about 64 Years, President of Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (Indian National Congress), Sathyamurthy Bhavan, 40, Thiru Vi Ka Salai, Chennai 600 002, residing at B15, Tower Block, TNHB Officer Quarters, Taylor Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600010 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: counsel on record Advocates suriya prakasam , chandramohan, victor,damodaran, D selvam , navash , venkadesh, sasikumar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS(Special Original Jurisdiction)W.P. No. of 2024 Tamil Nadu Congress Committee(Indian National Congress)Rep by its President K.SelvaperunthagaiSathyamurthy Bhavan,40, ThiruVaSalai,Chennai 600 002. Residing atB15, Tower Block, TNHB Officer Quarters,Taylor...

[09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

Uncategorized

[09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

Article byE.Duraivaiyapuri,Advocate,YMCA Building,Chennai – 1.[09/05, 08:58] sekarreporter1: 👍 [09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020)...