You may also like...
-
25.At this juncture, this Court observes that the suo motu revisions initiated over the past few weeks have been looked upon in some quarters as a sort of witch hunt spearheaded by one Judge of the High Court. It is, therefore, necessary to remind all concerned that thesesuo motu revisions have been exercised not by one Judge but by the High Court, as an institution, to ensure that the streams of criminal justice are not subverted and remain pure and unsullied. The orders of the High Court resonate the voice of not any individual judge but one institution. In other words, decision-making by the High Court is an institutional action and not the action of any particular judge. This is in keeping with the role of the High Court as a constitutional court vested with the power of judicial and administrative superintendence over the courts subordinate to it. 26.Having thus rejected the plea for recusal and the preliminary contentions raised on behalf of the State and the accused, the Court must now decide the next course of action. Having regard to the issues raised this Court is of the view that submissions on either side are likely to take up some time. Given the fact that a fresh roster will come into effect from the first week of October, these matters can be taken up and heard at length once the next roster is notified by the Court. The Registry is directed to list the matter on 09.10.2023 at 2:15 pm for arguments. 14.09.2023 KP Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order . To 1.The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Wing Viluppuram. 2.The Principal District Court Vellore. 3.Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. N.ANAND VENKATESH., J. KP SUO MOTU Crl.R.C.No.1419 of 2023 14.09.2023 .
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 14, 2023
-
இளவரசர் சார்லஸ்- முதல்வர் எம்ஜிஆர்
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 13, 2020
-
