Law tips 11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2016 (3) CTC 241 : mukanchand bothra S vs vairamuthu ramaswamy ( DB ) : contempt petition filed at behest of private indivdual without consent of advocate general is not maintainable ( section 2(c) of contempt of courts act 1971 )

[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2016 (3) CTC 241 : mukanchand bothra S vs vairamuthu ramaswamy ( DB ) : contempt petition filed at behest of private indivdual without consent of advocate general is not maintainable ( section 2(c) of contempt of courts act 1971 )
[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CPR 151 : Dr srikar reddy & others vs srishti associates : consumer forum has held that a medical practioner would be liable only when his conduct fell below that of standards of a reasonably competent practioner in his field
[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2000 (4) RCR ( criminal ) 654 ( delhi ) ( DB ) : In a criminal trial , magistrate is empowered to close prosecution evidence when prosecution is unable to produce its witnesses inspite of repeated opportunities
[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 340 : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2005 (6) SCC 109 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analysed and criticized but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives
[11/22, 09:46] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) All india criminal LR SC 96 : state of punjab vs madan mohan lal.verma : mere recovery of tainted money is not sufficient to convict the accused when substantive evidence in case is not reliable , unless there is evidence to prove payment of bribe or to show that the money was taken voluntarily as a bribe , mere reciept of amount by accused is not sufficient to fasten guilt in absence of any evidence with regard to demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification