SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority)  ‘I love the little boy you are now and the man you will become.’ This is the love of the parents for their son in the case in hand. The loving parents were put to shock when the son forbade them at their time of utmost necessity.

Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ‘I love the little boy you are now and the man you will become.’ This is the love of the parents for their son in the case in hand. The loving parents were put to shock when the son forbade them at their time of utmost necessity.

[10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08 [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020 ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK (Appointed by the Legal Services Authority) ‘I love the little boy you are now...

Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for which he had given representation in May 2022  Advocate General Shanmugasundaram had appeared for State Government and Public Prosecutor Mohammed Ali Jinnah had appeared for DGP and ADGP Coastal Police

Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for which he had given representation in May 2022  Advocate General Shanmugasundaram had appeared for State Government and Public Prosecutor Mohammed Ali Jinnah had appeared for DGP and ADGP Coastal Police

: Advocate B. Jagannath of the Madras High Court had filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a Relief for the Tamilnadu Police to Create an Anti Terrorist Squad – Quick Reaction response unit for...

In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.                                                                           [J.N.B., J.]      [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                                 10.10.2022.     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU  and  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH     C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011   

In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.                                                                          [J.N.B., J.]      [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                                10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT   RESERVED ON    :   29.09.2022 DELIVERED ON   :   10.10.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH   C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011...

[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses  How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran Vs State Crl.A.No.65 of 2020 dated 22.09.22   •Meaning of “unable to communicate verbally” in proviso to section 119 of IEA  •Effect of non following the mandate of section 119 IEA  •Principles @ para 16 of the judgment [10/10, 12:50] Sekarreporter 1: 👍

[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran Vs State Crl.A.No.65 of 2020 dated 22.09.22 •Meaning of “unable to communicate verbally” in proviso to section 119 of IEA •Effect of non following the mandate of section 119 IEA •Principles @ para 16 of the judgment [10/10, 12:50] Sekarreporter 1: 👍

[10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran...

Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged.  ……………………………….CJI.  (Uday Umesh Lalit)      ………………………………….J.  (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud)     ………………………………….J.  (Sanjay Kishan Kaul)     .………………………………….J.  (S. Abdul Nazeer)     .………………………………….J.  (K.M. Joseph)  New Delhi; October 9, 2022.   RESOLUTION      For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022.

Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged. ……………………………….CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit)  ………………………………….J. (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ………………………………….J. (Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .………………………………….J. (S. Abdul Nazeer) .………………………………….J. (K.M. Joseph) New Delhi; October 9, 2022. RESOLUTION  For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022.

  RESOLUTION   For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the...

The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly awaiting the assumption of office by the Hon’ble Judge as the 50th Chief Justice of India, following the footsteps of the illustrious Chief Justice of Mr. Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.

The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly awaiting the assumption of office by the Hon’ble Judge as the 50th Chief Justice of India, following the footsteps of the illustrious Chief Justice of Mr. Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.

[10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter 1: The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM     W.P.No.27431 of 2017  and  W.M.P.No.29320 of 2017     D.Elangovan           For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Gnanasekar                                            for Mr.S.Ashok kumar                                           For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru                                           Special Government Pleader            ORDER       13.Thus, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner was denied an opportunity without any valid or acceptable reason and he is eligible and entitled for selection or appointment, since other candidates who scored lesser marks than that of the petitioner were selected and appointed. For all these reasons, the writ petition is to be considered.     

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27431 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.29320 of 2017   D.Elangovan           For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Gnanasekar                                           for Mr.S.Ashok kumar                                         For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru                                          Special Government Pleader          ORDER       13.Thus, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner was denied an opportunity without any valid or acceptable reason and he is eligible and entitled for selection or appointment, since other candidates who scored lesser marks than that of the petitioner were selected and appointed. For all these reasons, the writ petition is to be considered.     

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED: 29.09.2022   CORAM:                                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27431 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.29320 of 2017   D.Elangovan                                                  … Petitioner...

நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்பிரமணியம், சான்றிதழ்களை தாமதமாக சமர்ப்பித்தார் என்பதற்காக வேலைவாய்ப்பு வழங்க மறுக்க முடியாது

நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்பிரமணியம், சான்றிதழ்களை தாமதமாக சமர்ப்பித்தார் என்பதற்காக வேலைவாய்ப்பு வழங்க மறுக்க முடியாது

தாமதமாக சான்றிதழ்களை சமர்ப்பித்தார் என்பதற்காக பணி நியமனம் மறுக்க முடியாது எனத் தெரிவித்த சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், திருப்பூரைச் சேர்ந்த கலப்பு மணம் புரிந்தவருக்கு, அந்த முன்னுரிமை ஒதுக்கீட்டின் கீழ் நான்கு வாரங்களில் பணிநியமனம் வழங்க பள்ளிக்கல்வித்துறைக்கு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. அரசுப் பள்ளிகளில் ஆய்வக உதவியாளர் பணியிடங்களுக்கான தேர்வு...

Sekarreporter1: [10/9, 10:43] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites conducts MASTER SERIES – Online Intensive Coaching Combined Crash Course for APP / DJ / CJ – Aspirants / Advocates / Law Students  Crash Course on CRIMINAL MAJOR ACTS  Topic: The Nuances of Victim Compensation in CrPC 1973 Faculty: T.K.S Muthukumaran, Advocate

Sekarreporter1: [10/9, 10:43] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites conducts MASTER SERIES – Online Intensive Coaching Combined Crash Course for APP / DJ / CJ – Aspirants / Advocates / Law Students Crash Course on CRIMINAL MAJOR ACTS Topic: The Nuances of Victim Compensation in CrPC 1973 Faculty: T.K.S Muthukumaran, Advocate

[10/9, 10:43] Sekarreporter1: [10/9, 10:43] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites conducts MASTER SERIES – Online Intensive Coaching Combined Crash Course for APP / DJ / CJ – Aspirants / Advocates / Law Students Crash...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN  Crl.O.P.No. 23044 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 14759 & 14760 of 2022  Seeman. For Petitioners          : Mr.S.Xavier Felix                                   For R1                      :  Mr.S.Santhosh        Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R.     Chargesheet quashed

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 23044 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 14759 & 14760 of 2022 Seeman. For Petitioners          : Mr.S.Xavier Felix                                  For R1                      :  Mr.S.Santhosh       Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R. Chargesheet quashed

lIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  23.09.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 23044 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 14759 & 14760 of 2022 Seeman Anbu Thennarasu Suthakar Kajendran Jaiveeran Purushothaman Rajesh...